Lugh@futurology.todayM to Futurology@futurology.todayEnglish · 26 days agoSanta Clarita County in California is using AI to weed out racist covenants from its 24 million deed documents that date back to 1850.hai.stanford.eduexternal-linkmessage-square10fedilinkarrow-up121arrow-down11
arrow-up120arrow-down1external-linkSanta Clarita County in California is using AI to weed out racist covenants from its 24 million deed documents that date back to 1850.hai.stanford.eduLugh@futurology.todayM to Futurology@futurology.todayEnglish · 26 days agomessage-square10fedilink
minus-squareLugh@futurology.todayOPMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·26 days agoSurely highlighting 5 million out of 24 million is more efficient than checking them all?
minus-squareknightly the Sneptaur@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·26 days agoIf you don’t care about false negatives, maybe.
minus-squarepsud@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·26 days agoThere are only so many historical synonyms for black people, racist language should be searchable with few false negatives
minus-squareknightly the Sneptaur@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·25 days agoNo “AI” required~
minus-squareLugh@futurology.todayOPMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·26 days ago false negatives I don’t get your logic here either. A false negative would have zero implications for anyone. It would have no legal standing or relevance.
minus-squareknightly the Sneptaur@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·26 days ago A false negative would have zero implications for anyone. It would have no legal standing or relevance. I don’t understand, in what way does allowing a racist deed covenant stand unchallenged have zero implications or relevance? If it did, then what would be the point of rooting them out in the first place?
Surely highlighting 5 million out of 24 million is more efficient than checking them all?
If you don’t care about false negatives, maybe.
There are only so many historical synonyms for black people, racist language should be searchable with few false negatives
No “AI” required~
I don’t get your logic here either. A false negative would have zero implications for anyone. It would have no legal standing or relevance.
I don’t understand, in what way does allowing a racist deed covenant stand unchallenged have zero implications or relevance?
If it did, then what would be the point of rooting them out in the first place?