This isn’t even an indictment on Zach anymore this is just an honest question I’d like some perspective on. With that loss, our odds of making the playoffs have become negligible (something like 5% according to ESPN analytics) so why don’t we see what any other QB looks like in this system? This isn’t just a question to the team either. Why are some of you so opposed to seeing Zach subbed out when he’s only ever shown us a range from mediocre to bad for three (!!!) years?
Because these jamokes made it so that any other in-house QB option is either worse than Zach or just as bad. So they manipulated the narrative so that they can continue to trot Zach out, while saying he gives them the best shot to win.
Remember boys and girls, if Zach sucks while being pressured it’s the O-line’s fault.
If he sucks with time it’s the OC’s fault.
But it can NEVER be his fault.
This message brought to you by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
The plays honestly looked fine today too he just has no timing on these throws. If Garrett doesn’t end up requesting a trade we might see him die on the field because Zach hangs him out to dry in the middle of the field twice a game
Yes, the Run-Run-Pass offense or the Run-Run-Run pass offense is good play calling. Not to mention trotting out Ozumah every snap
They actually threw on 1st a lot on Monday. Usually incomplete. Then ran on 2nd down for a couple to set up the inevitable 3rd and long. And, you know…
We did we traded for Rodgers he’s out, Zach gives us the best chance to win. We all know Zach is not that good but you can’t give up game changing penalties & terrible play calling.
Did people really watch that game and honestly thought Zach was the problem? I don’t get it. Fire Hackett, let AR8 call plays. That will have a bigger effect than swapping Zach out for a 3rd string QB.