• deur@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you cannot write safe Rust code, it places your ability to ever write safe code in doubt.

    • porgamrer@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      You could write a compiler for a low-level language in anything. Honestly makes little sense that most people do it in C++ when they’re only going to replace it anyway.

    • philm@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Zig > Rust because actually writing safe Rust code

      Start thinking more functional, I rarely have issues with the borrow-checker, or even have to write unsafe. But it obviously depends on the context, when the issue at hand really requires a lot of interior mutability or unsafe can be pain.

      I’m also super fast nowadays with Rust, probably faster than with any other language (thanks to great tooling?).