It’s getting more and more unhinged on LinkedIn.

    • pivot_root@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Rust is one of the harder languages for beginners to learn because of its borrow checker and strict ownership model, but it shouldn’t take more than a month or two for a competent senior to pick up.

      It’s going to be deeply unpleasant and seem like a problem if:

      • You’re writing dangerously bad C or C++ code already.
      • You’ve only ever used Python or JavaScript.
      • You try to shoehorn OOP and inheritance into it (Rust idioms are composition and functional programming).
      • You refuse to use/learn pattern matching.
      • You’re a pedant about “pretty” syntax.

      If someone is at a senior level and any of those apply, they probably shouldn’t be at a senior level, though.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Can confirm, I’m a senior and I didn’t have much trouble with Rust. After a couple weeks, I was writing useful code. After a month, I generally stopped cussing at the compiler.

        I’m still finding odd surprises here and there, but it’s honestly no big deal. I’m about as productive in Rust as I am in Python, which I use at my day job, though I use them for very different domains.

      • barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        You’re a pedant about “pretty” syntax.

        Oh I’m definitely whinging about it but it doesn’t make me stop using Rust. People coming from C or especially C++ don’t really have a leg to stand on, though, neither do people coming from ML. It’s Haskell people who get hit hardest.

      • Jocarnail@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        19 hours ago

        I’m still learning Rust coming from Python and R and honestly point 2 and 3 are not even that bad. Sure I have been bashing my head against some corners, and the lack of OOP was somewhat unexpected, but imho the language really helps you think about what you are doing.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          the lack of OOP

          Rust absolutely has OOP, that’s what Traits are for. It just doesn’t have classical inheritance, so you structure your patterns a bit differently.

          That said, I lean more into functional-inspired style anyway, which tends to work pretty well w/ Rust.