It’ll definitely continue until the inauguration at least.
It’ll definitely continue until the inauguration at least.
Those are really quite rare. Most have workarounds these days or just work outright.
You can degoogle on Android you know. Takes some effort, but the end result is better than moving into a walled garden.
I do not think this is a strong argument. Nobody considers NASA to be the “space Nazis” either, just because some employees had connections with Nazi Germany. It’s a huge leap to claim NATO follows or is connected to some Nazi ideology based on this.
That’s fairly normal for any battery, regardless of charging rate. I have a OnePlus 9 and haven’t really noticed any huge battery degradation, my phone still easily makes it to the end of the day.
And if not, I charge it for just a couple minutes and get half of the charge back. It’s pretty great. The newest phones can even charge at 100W+. You barely need to bother plugging it in overnight, just plug it in when you take a shower or have breakfast or something.
Shareholders can demand external audits under threat of selling the stock. There’s plenty shareholders can do (and have done in the past). They don’t just sit idle and not do anything you know.
Shareholders seek to maximize profits. If that includes a lawsuit to squeeze out even more investments, then why not?
They never bothered to check if Boeing did what they had to do security wise. Only once it threatened their profits they sprang into action.
⛤
I think the current logo would work fine as a unicode character. I dislike the three anuses for a logo.
Plenty of fun to be had with LLMs.
That’s a very specific usecase though that the majority of programmers likely will never have to face.
Strange, it’s the exact opposite for me. Moon in dark mode, sun in light mode.
They put money in Bitcoin, but not the tech behind it. To them it’s just stocks to be manipulated in order to get a profit.
Water has a flavour you silly billy.
You’re missing the part where Apple initially wanted to partner with Masimo and when they refused, decided to poach several employees from Masimo to develop the competing product.
Masimo seems to have a legitimate case here, and Apple is definitely in the wrong, as they knowingly attempted to copy Masimo’s product. The late publication of the patents could be due to literally anything, but it doesn’t seem to be done willfully to ‘trap’ Apple into this lawsuit. Because of that, I’d argue that this is a bit of a fault in the broken patent system, but that Masimo is not deliberately patent trolling here.
Imagine never having monkey-butt (an itchy asshole}. No more skid marks either.
Can’t say that I’m having this when just using wipes… Maybe wipe a little better?
Anti-authoritarian can lead to difficulties in coordination with other teams. I’m not saying it has to, but it can.
Not doing something unethical from a moral standpoint makes you a good person, but not necessarily a good employee. But in the vast majority of cases engineers aren’t presented with morally dubious tasks.
Not doing what you’re told because you think you know better is also anti-authoritarian, and definitely would be considered a bad trait to have for an employee.
Team coordination is now being hostile to employees?
Who do you prefer, someone who:
Or someone who:
You can be a brilliant developer and a terrible employee at the same time. If you want to design software as you like it, you should be in the design sessions. And not ignore the hard work those people already did and throw it out without discussion.
Anti-authoritarianism is a bad trait. Critical thinking and standing up for your ideas is not. I frequently question design decisions I have not made myself, because A) there could be something that was overlooked or B) I’m overlooking something and I don’t have a full picture of the scope. Either should be resolved by a quick chat with the designers, not by me ignoring instructions and doing whatever I feel like is best.
Part of being a good developer is also accepting that you might be wrong and your ideas might be bad. That doesn’t mix well with anti-authoritarianism.
It is if you’re the one trying to coordinate multiple product teams and one of them doesn’t build to spec, introduces different behavior in edge cases or declares something to be “not their responsibility”. Anti-authoritarianism is a bad trait to combine with “being wrong”.
Someone who wasn’t present during the design meetings, stakeholder calls, planning sessions etc… can absolutely still have very good input regarding decisions that were made. But they should raise those concerns with whoever made the final designs and discuss them, not decide on their own to deviate from the given instructions. They may not see the full picture and cause a ton of delays that way.
They did get somewhat better dialogue, but their characters also have some horribly cringy moments.
I actually think this form factor makes more sense than a two-fold. With two-folds you get this weird not-quite-square aspect ratio, but this gives you something much closer to a very typical 16:9. Perfect for watching movies or streaming games.
I do want a proper android device though, which Huawei can’t provide anymore unfortunately. But I hope other manufacturers try their hand at this form factor. Still, massive props to Huawei on the design and engineering feat, it’s genuinely the first phone I’ve seen in years that made me reconsider what I want in a phone.
And no, obviously a tri-fold isn’t necessary, but neither are smartphones in general. Took me years to decide to purchase one and I was fine without one (started with a year-old Samsung S7, for reference).