I feel like “agreed” carries less weight if the agreement is non-binding.

China still have ways to go, but this show that they seems to make at least some progress

All the interesting Chinese chips are by other companies. Huawei, Alibaba, etc. all have CPUs that blow this out of the water.

The fun fact is that it actually costs more to do this

Do you have a source? IIRC, the move to custom cores was explicitly cited as a concern for ARM’s revenue.

Afaik Intel actually designed this Ericsson chip or so I was told.

Lol, sure you didn’t hear that from me? I mentioned it on the Anandtech forums some months ago.

They’ve been trying. And thus far, failing.

Apparently not a problem for Qualcomm, Mediatek, Samsung, or Huawei. And Apple certainly doesn’t shy away from litigation.

DDR6 is years away.

Wut?

Mediatek, Samsung, and Huawei also have their own modems.

I doubt any big, mainstream western corporations would use GeForce cards for AI

Why wouldn’t they?

Then why don’t you just stick with the App Store?

Tbh, I don’t pay much attention to their authors. What drama did he cause?

That’s an Intel custom/semi-custom chip, not a true 3rd party design win. Intel 4 isn’t even being offered through IFS. Pretty shoddy article.

RDNA1 and 2 were pretty successful

AMD’s dGPU marketshare has been doing terribly these last few years. Clearly they weren’t successful enough.

Vega was very successful in APUs

Compared to what? Intel?

but was still successful for data center

AMD’s marketshare in the datacenter is pretty darn negligible.

Also, he ran graphic divisions, not a Walmart. People don’t fail upwards in these industries at these levels.

Why do you think it’s any different? There are plenty of high profile examples even at the CEO level?

The fact is that every notable initiative Raja’s been a part of for the past decade-ish has been a failure vs original targets. At a certain point, one has to acknowledge a common factor.

Source?

Nvidia will not make a X090 series GPU with the AI stuff turned off.

That’s what they said about the Titan line, at one point…

Microsoft has always wanted to keep him. The OpenAI board fired him for ideological reasons/power struggle, realized they would be killing the entire company, and decided to salvage the company even at the cost of their jobs.

And that explains why he’s now back? And has had MS’s support the entire time?

Oh please. The comment I’m responding to is engaging in blatant bad faith. I give a 1:1 analogy of what they’re proposing, and that’s an insult?

What is it with you AI circlejerkers and constantly calling people Luddites?

Calling a spade a spade. You have a better term for someone who wants to hold back technology because it threatens some small population in an existing industry?