The content about the reasons for different smiles is cool. And the highlighting of the training data influencing things is also good stuff.

But as far as realistic image generation based on culturally relatable smiling sounds like a skill issue. You can’t just generate images about specific times or settings or people with “defaults”. You have to specify your prompt.

Lol also the importing of lpad and iseven

Agree. Teenagers or the otherwise immature wish for this because it feels like some sort of vengeance or something. An exertion of will…

But the real deal is not wanting political violence at all.

Ideally the design of the road should bring the speed down. Speed humps, snaking S’s, flexible poles close to the driving area, etc

You can’t effectively legislate away a safety issue, using fines. Make the system safer.

The dude showing up with onions would be an incredible twist

It supposes that our garliccel didn’t need the income, and they the original garlic guy does. By obliterating sales, he harms him now, and in the future.

There is a script between you and the business. Learn it, master it

When presented with a mad max waste land, would you prefer to be on a pole, or driving?

As I stated in my comment, he takes direct leadership in his businesses and his businesses filed. Contesting this point is not goalpost moving and would have been meaningful discussion, yesterday. Arguing about her business background has nothing to do with my original comment. I’d recommend to read the article, which is not from this year, and discusses the situation about his bankruptcy situation.

Bankruptcies are not “common” for successful business folks, but they do happen.

She has worked as a public servant in a legal capacity, which we can certainly agree is important for a modern society. A president should also be well versed in such things, which trump is not. So, on that basis they break even. Weather you agree with her policy or approach, you have to accept that she has worked for the government, and therefore the furtherance of the nation. You may believe her approach was not to your liking, but I’m thankful people work in governmental, public roles too. I think such people are completely valid candidates for higher office.

Facts indeed. I provided a source of the bankruptcies for companies that he was the leader of, as I specified.

Edit Any discussion of the consequences of those bankruptcies or the validity of candidates based on their business background is outside of the scope, and a goalpost move.

My original involvement was to fact check the bankruptcy claim, not discuss the value or issues with bankruptcy. The goal posts were moved to bring up Harris being a long time government employee. I spent replies discussing how.the differences are largely semantic, but that’s literally besides my original point, and you are free to have your opinion on government work, because it’s not what I’m here for anyway.

Trump, as leader of his businesses, DID file bankruptcies, as the article describes.

Her office would have designated the need for positions and filled them. They would have had a budget and worked within it to staff.

Another goalpost move on p/l.

The statement is true, per the specifications I allowed. I never indicated any value assessment as you focused on. That’s not the point

Edit, to address the goalpost move: as a DA she certainly would have been in charge of staffing an office and had many humans in jobs. More than zero. So that’s not true

Well if we allow for “Donald Trump” to also include his businesses, which he proudly indicates he has direct leadership in…

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2016/live-updates/general-election/real-time-fact-checking-and-analysis-of-the-first-presidential-debate/fact-check-has-trump-declared-bankruptcy-four-or-six-times/

Well the tweet is racist, but I don’t want my house to smell like anything aside from when food is being served.

Generally agree, the issue is when they forget

Meh I deleted. “Deeply annoyed” is all the same

Return your cart if you can. Don’t if you can’t.

It’s simple shit.

If you can’t, the meme isn’t about you.

It is however reasonable to suggest a journey that is 99% over and has been completed successfully, can be completed to 100%.

But if not, refer to the beginning.

That’s it.

Edit if you leave it anywhere because you are lazy, not incapable, then the meme is about you.

You didn’t quote or seemingly read that line.

deleted by creator

Obviously every disability is different. It’s a meme, I’m not writing comprehensive policy here

Edit the point is if you normally navigate the grocery errand, make it to your car without issue, are not incapable of returning the cart, but choose.to.just ditch it because you are lazy, then the meme is talking about you.

If you aren’t able to move the cart any further, ideally park near the return spot, or tell the staff, or get the accomodations you need.