data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fbb5e/fbb5e0104f3117600d949df44baa6ca8d11e16d7" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/098bc/098bccdc5e7eabe662da9cf2d6d9afed00bd3eca" alt=""
Why choose “offended” as the verb here? I’m not saying I’ve never seeing an offensive movie… But what you described is an annoyance at most.
It’s almost as if you are claiming offense to be contrarian.
Why choose “offended” as the verb here? I’m not saying I’ve never seeing an offensive movie… But what you described is an annoyance at most.
It’s almost as if you are claiming offense to be contrarian.
Usually the soap dispenser is above
Common in factories where lots of people need to wash their hands at the same time.
It’s not likely they would. The US did some fucked up stuff, but (in this case) didn’t try to hide it…
According to Bloomberg, Johann Rupert told the conference to bear in mind that when the poor rise up, the middle classes won’t want to buy luxury goods for fear of exposing their wealth.
“How is society going to cope with structural unemployment and the envy, hatred and the social warfare?” he said. “We are destroying the middle classes at this stage and it will affect us. It’s unfair. So that’s what keeps me awake at night.”
… its almost comical how he thinks of this. The first thought is his businesses wont be able to sell luxury to anyone but the ultra wealthy.
the pardon is for tax and gun charges, right? no drug charges?
at this point I don’t give a fuck, I just don’t want to hear the words “democrat” and “strategist” in the same sentence anymore.
Damnit Christopher, why you gotta be all misogynist?
To answer your question, no it is not valid. The fact that you don’t actually stand by the word offended really answers yourself.