The fall of Rome took over two and a half centuries.

Sometimes you need to accept things are broken and move toward fixing them, not blindly stumble forward expecting everything to right itself.

I ignored you and stumbled upon your comment again. I will go back to not knowing who you are very soon.

No, you big thumbed dipstick, I’m taking the information into account as it’s given - not reading into it like you because I’ve got a hard on for hating men.

Pregaming is something that happens immediately before going to do something else. You don’t pregame for 2 hours you pregame for like 30 minutes, it is something you do and then you do something else. Presumably more drinking, which would have to happen pretty quickly if you’re going to keep the ball rolling.

This all likely took place over the course of an hour, actually if they’re doing shots then this easily could have taken place over the course of a half hour. We don’t know enough, but we sure as shit know what you think considering how fucking vehemently you’ve defended your position based on incomplete information.

She SA’d him, you’re a troglodyte. Fin.

What was that? I can’t hear you over the moral high ground.

Remember, the one defending the sexual predator is you.

Great, glad we’re on the same page. Have a nice go fuck yourself.

Do you accept that they were both drunk and that consent works both ways?

Jesus christ, imagine bloviating this much about a drunk person not thinking exactly what you want them to think. I cannot imagine having my head so firmly shoved up my ass.

Edit: actually, it’s worse - you’re attempting to completely gloss over her sexual assault of him. I’d actually argue that just makes you a bad fucking person.

Great, so they were both still drunk. Do you or do you not accept that consent works both ways?

I think their point is that if the people making the games were given fair compensation that they would be more willing to sacrifice IP rights.

I don’t see what makes them think that other than their own personal feelings on the matter, but I think that’s the message.

Fuck no

‘Express yourself’ through censorship. Brilliant stuff, folks.

No I think their point stands. There are plenty of words to choose from, you simply don’t need to say shit. Like it is quite literally that simple, use the word or don’t.

I want to point out two things

1: She threw up, assuming she doesn’t have a pocket dimension in her throat she likely threw up most of the alcohol.

2: OP was almost certainly drinking. OP makes no mention of throwing up. We can pretty safely assume OP is also drunk, and likely has more alcohol still in his system than her.

Seems like a lot of people ITT think that consent is a one way street. He said no and was drunk, she pushed. We can at the very least admit that she sexually assaulted him, and if you think otherwise you need to rethink some things.

I can see what you’re saying, but you are making some assumptions and that’s entirely due to OP being an unreliable narrator.

Throwing up usually purges a lot of the alcohol from your system. OP makes no mention of throwing up themselves, and I’m assuming they were drinking too. That means there’s a solid chance there’s more alcohol in OPs system than hers. You do understand that consent works both ways, yes?

On the hand other

No, you can’t call people “new bundle of sticks used to burn gay people (and others) alive”.

Shocker, I know - who gets so bent up over a little religiously (which we all know is ironclad reasoning) justified brutal murder?

People don’t like the things they believe to be challenged, and many people fail to recognize what is a belief and what is a fact.

It’s the problem with knowing enough to not know how little you actually do (know).

Just beat the game.

God damn it’s good. The only way I knew about it was because I was checking Steam new releases. Please god understand that this would have sold with better advertising.