Nah. So long they remain the largest comoanies in tech, the FAANG companies have an endless buffet of overconfident and naive new grads to feast on. Entitled kids who will excitedly walk through the door and proudly display their comoany golf shirts to anyone they can trap in a corner while explaining how they’re remaking and reinventing ways to squeeze and manipulate customers in the name of shareholder value.

YouTube has been an alt-right pipeline for a very long time now. If you so much as smell right-leaning content in the next room, it wilk start serving you truck loads of right wing and alt-right recommendations.

Yeah, but the US is all about its exceptionalism, so it gets to be the exception.

“Leaked”, as if tech companies reach multi-billion dollar evaluations based on retail sales.

“Also, ‘check ink levels’ by counting how many pages were printed while this cartridge was installed”

Nah. Copyright is broken, but it’s broken because it lasts too long, and it can be held by constructs. People should still reserve the right to not have the things they’ve made incorporated into projects or products they don’t want to be associated with.

The right to refusal is important. Consent is important. The default permission should not be shifted to “yes” in anybody’s mind.

The fact that a not insignificant number of people seem to think the only issue here is money points to some pretty fucking entitled views among the would-be-billionaires.

The Nazi bar analogy says nothing about agreement. Just that failing to remove Nazis from your bar is a great way to flood your bar with Nazis, because once they know its safe for them to Nazi it up in your establishment, they’ll tell their friends about you.

If you don’t proactively remove the Nazis, you’re creating a Nazi safe space, whether you agree with them or not.

They just really, really love running Nazi bars. They just don’t like it when the normies realizes that the neighbourhood bar is a Nazi bar.

The only thing they hate is not taking their money.

Ackshually, the answer is 4

6÷2*(1+2)

6÷(1+2)*2

6÷(3)*2

2*2

4

You’re welcome

It’s also clear that people who deny the extent to which capitalism actually makes the world worse either a) don’t know what capitalism is, or b) are rent seekers

The smarter way would be using balanced training data.

will make the tech unreliable

Man, do I have some bad news for you

It’s a non-profit. There are no investors.

Hah.

OpanAI, Inc. is non-profit. OpenAI Global is a for-profit entity, and has been for years now. They’re trying to have their cake and eat it, too.

multiverse theory is a…theory.

So is optics. So is Newtonian gravity. So is relativity. So is quantum mechanics. So is… Everything. This is a gotcha on the level of “it’s made of chemicals”.

In this context, “theory” doesn’t mean “unsupported idea”. It’s a framework for understanding observable evidence, that is often well supported by evidence.

Fortunately, “multiverse theory” isn’t a theory…

They believe that Mozilla taking Google’s money is bad. But they think Brave surreptitiously changing urls to affiliate links and selling user data to ai bros is totally peachy.

Really, as with anyone who knows about Brave’s tomfoolery but accepts it with open arms, he just seems to be a supporter of their CEO, Brendan Eich, who’s a Silicon Valley douche and bigot. This seems to be supported by the particular animosity shown toward Mozilla, from where Eich was unceremoniously expelled from (due to the wave of negative PR that resulted form his being named their CEO) just before starting Brave.

Guy’s a fanboy. And one that has no problem. Throwing slurs around when discussing things like software. It’s best to just ignore him.

Yeah, but it’s “confusing”, and “not owned by some rent-seeking narcissist”, so no one seems to care.