They didn’t convert anything to anything, and the 1.010010001… number isn’t binary
They didn’t convert anything to anything, and the 1.010010001… number isn’t binary
We need to start teaching formal logic in grade schools I’m going insane.
That’s so elegant. I love it.
In terms of formal logic, this…
Since Pi is infinite and non-repeating, would that mean any finite sequence of non-repeating digits from 0-9 should appear somewhere in Pi in base 10?
…and this…
Does any possible string of infinite non-repeating digits contain every possible finite sequence of non repeating digits?
are equivalent statements.
The phrase “since X, would that mean Y” is the same as asking “is X a sufficient condition for Y”. Providing ANY example of X WITHOUT Y is a counter-example which proves X is NOT a sufficient condition.
The 1.010010001… example is literally one that is taught in classes to disprove OPs exact hypothesis. This isn’t a discussion where we’re both offering different perspectives and working towards a truth we don’t both see, thus is a discussion where you’re factually wrong and I’m trying to help you learn why lol.
Its not stupid. To disprove a claim that states “All X have Y” then you only need ONE example. So, as pick a really obvious example.
If AI is even halfway decently aligned with human morals, then it’s gonna do a better job than the ruling class does.