

No


No


Improving is insane for what you have seen.
Not for what is possible or what has been done already.


No. It only recovered when it stumbled back into a flat area. That OBVIOUSLY demonstrates that it’s too stupid to deal with dynamic terrain.


Considering I’m shitting on the robots, that only further proves my point that ya’ll are brainless morons merely voting down that which you do not understand. Sad.


Your sarcasm only proves how absolutely pathetic you and everyone else’s understanding of robotics is.


Nah, the routine was not supposed to veer in that direction. Everyone lauding this as a win do not understand how simple these robots are.
This was supposed to be nothing but a vapid PR event that sold an image that is still not possible by consumer-grade robotics.


You need to understand… regaining stability on a PERFECTLY FLAT AND PREDICTABLE surface is not new nor novel for robotics.


There are user agent switcher extensions for FireFox et. al. that can sidestep the garbage, anticompetitive throttling Google does against FireFox.
It’s also nice for those certain stupid websites that think they cannot work in FireFox…


It’s definitely going to pop hard, because those “verifying agents” are just more models computing correlation with sources, not actually verifying anything.


How exactly are they going to proprietarily extend Linux in a way where everyone will need their proprietary extensions so much that people abandon other Linux flavors without them…?


Why? The pros know how to breach systems. The real question is what are you going to do with the breach?
Today is the lazy man’s game. This kid just played with fire and got burned. Nothing more.


Microslop


Ignorance will never save you.
The toilet in an isolated room is good, though. Keep all those poo particles more contained.


Yes. I also said there was plenty of silly things.
Two things can be true at once. Especially when there are far more episodes of previous Trek, and not only TOS.


Cartoons don’t set lower expectations. They naturally come with a different set of expectations that happens to have more leeway with writing. Especially in comedies vs overproduced “serious” shows.


Fully agreed there! They also do mature topics better than many humor focused cartoons. At least more regularly.


He would be far more correct in the general sense if it were only bigots and idiots complaining that were never going to be fans of a more intellectual show anyways.
New Trek has had lots of criticism from actual, existing Trek fans that want to see the IP flourish into another 100+ episode series. Of course the usual bigots and propagandists also hated on it, but they were always going to! To thusly pretend there are zero honest fans who didn’t like Discovery or Picard, etc, is to completely ignore valid critique.
Star Trek might be different for everyone, but there are many core throughlines and principles that were heavily changed for New Trek. That doesn’t inherently make New Trek bad by itself, but it also means the old fans aren’t just whining to whine.
Maybe they actually have some good points when they’re comparing things that are getting dropped one after the other, not even approaching episode counts that the original hit with three seasons, to the rest of the older series which all have significantly more than that.
Yes, they all had silly episodes, so why did these older things with plenty of sillyness garner so many fans? It’s foolish to pretend it’s all bigots and idiots simply saying, “it’s different!”.
Your inability to grasp reality is both pathetic and hilarious