No one’s saying the points raised are not valid, just that there’s no need to be a cunt about it in what should be a professional setting.
IMO, if a developer finds Rust too difficult to learn, they probably shouldn’t be writing kernel code in the first place.
I actually introduced rust to my workplace this week, with a workshop reimplementing part of one of our service.
It seems people liked it. Now I want to look into how we could create Conan packages (to be consumed by c++ code) out of crates. I guess I’ll use the CXX crate to generate C++ headers, but other than that I don’t know.
Lol what a rag
Instagram too, hardly a Chinese problem
Indeed, that number doesn’t tell us much. Even the other categories of the same question are debatable, e.g. political beliefs and language.
It would have been better to simply put the checkboxes there and have an extra question about being discrimated against
Sure, and then the big client bankrolling your company needs the feature in production for next week.
If you’re gafam you can tell them to get screwed and that you need more time, but at least in my experience I’ve always been on the other side of the table, and sometimes you gotta change a setting in a production DB because the related GUI change was not approved since the guy doing the review was sick and the other reviewer was not sure which shade of green to use somewhere on the page.
I agree with that security is not something you add on the side, but circumstances change and things are not always in control. You say mistakes happen, but not everything I mentioned is caused by mistakes, sometimes the shortcut is completely intentional. Companies only care about security when it’s too late, at which point they will blame you for writing unsafe software, but if your company or your job depend are at stake, that’s often a risk you have to take
Dependencies, scope creep, feature creep, off by one errors, misconfiguration, unclear/unenforced contracts/invariants… Most of those are trivial to solve at small scale, but the more moving parts you have, the more complex it becomes
I think this has to do with web/mobile dev and higher management usually being apple users
Having 30min+ incremental compile times here (C++), I envy your situation ahah
Maybe he’s getting downvoted for his US defaultism.
So you’re vegan but for a video game, basically.
Are there triggers in the sql database? It’s too easy otherwise
Aren’t those two projects mostly maintained by people on the job? I don’t know what’s the proportion for the rust team, but I think it’s getting much less sponsoring. Hopefully this will get better quickly
Literally anything but a bootcamp. Doubt they even cover the stuff you want, and if they do you won’t learn more than what you picked I think
Just to point out, but AI training is very different from humans learning so drawing parallels between the both does not make much sense
Obviously, but you don’t answer my question. Do people really get interviews thanks to their open source work? OP is more likely to land a job by networking than by contributing to open source, is what I am getting at.
As usual with those posts, basic information such as country of residence / spoken languages are missing. Finding student jobs in Germany is trivial, but I doubt those contracts can be done for non-residents
“only white people condone genocide” is not racist?