Just never saw the need for it.

I believed they maybe weren’t listening because those cases that people claim as “proof” of listening can usually be explained in other ways as well. People tend to assume they were listening because its the easier explanation but with the amount of data that Meta has, they can easily lead people into thinking about things by showing specific posts on the Facebook timeline and also predict to some extent what people may end up talking about based on things like how many times you replay a certain video and how long did you keep certain posts in focus on the screen and that sort of stuff that people often don’t realize is also data for them.

Still, I would never put my hand on fire for them and never completely discarded the possibility of them listening.

Well we always accused Meta of listening. If it was their partners, they technically weren’t lying when they said they weren’t. “we don’t need to listen to you” was technically correct too, it just missed one word: “we don’t need to listen to you ourselves”

I just got the game without realizing it was new.

And there’s a ton of articles here with very misleading titles, specially on technology communities. At some point I noticed three large threads in a row where the article title claimed one thing but even the article itself was about something completely different.

Yeah but comparing a fingerprint to a finger is a simpler test than comparing a fingerprint to another fingerprint and checking if they may be two fingers from the same person.

They do know how it works: it detected a pattern in the difference between fingers and checks that.

Also this would usually not be needed explained to a jury. If they have the suspect in custody they can just check their fingerprints directly.

someone could probably extend it to something a little more serious.

Will do.

deleted by creator

Tbf as long as it doesn’t go public it will probably be fine regardless of who takes the job. It doesn’t take a genius to keep up the good work in a company that can afford to plan long time.

Over the past decades I’ve had several different women (girlfriends, mother-in-laws, coworkers) complain that I “acted too softly” in some situation or another, saying I should have raised my voice or made threats or stuff like that. If I could go back in time I wouldn’t act differently in any of those situations.

In your case I would probably complain to someone about security not showing up though. In a hospital setting it is their responsibility.

A lot of times he couldn’t figure things out by himself. They made a big point of his team being there to complete him, not just to do what he told them to.

In the season where they were looking for a new team member there was one candidate that was pretty much a 1:1 copy of House, who got the best evaluations in the tests and stuff, but in the end got disqualified for “what use is there in someone who’ll think of the same stuff as me?”

A silver lining in having a bunch of mental disorders.

I want that wallpaper.

Did people pay for the game before or after the developer removed any references to it being an MMO?

If they made something that is not an MMO it’s only natural that they won’t want it to be presented as if it was one, even if they originally intended to create the game as an MMO.

I don’t think the game deserves to be cruficied just for failing to reach the goals the devs had in mind, as long as it is not being sold as if it had. Folks can buy the game, realize it’s not what they hoped for, refund and move on. Or better yet, hopefully they can realize it’s not the game they were expecting based on the store page and not even buy it in the first place.

Now if the dev is misleading people about what the game is, or if people paid for one thing long ago and received another in the end, then nevermind me and carry on.

Oh I must’ve got it confused with some other game then, I could swear the world map was presented as a globe.

I think they’re just talking about the game being open world in a full planet that you can clearly see is a planet and is large and diverse enough to actually feel like a full planet.

Still not the first at that either. Valheim for example is a round planet and open world and has several biomes. But there the world isn’t really impressive, so maybe that’s what they are trying to be the first of?

Based on the trailer they are clearly trying to be the first game to actually achieve something but it’s hard to define what that something really is.

I remember moving a project from github to gitlab years ago (before MS) and the process to move all the non-git data from github was just as easy as moving the git repo itself. Thanks to gitlab’s efforts perhaps, but I didn’t expect github to have made it difficult for them based on the experience I ended up having.

Because nobody knows for sure how much a show will be worth in the future and everyone is afraid of losing or wasting potential money.

Or: “scientists develop new technology that makes a part of their work hundreds of times more effective”