Based on the only information we have, OPs sister is two. So the sister is 2. Trivial.

I don’t understand your question.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LLVM#Intermediate_representation

yes, zen4 is the ryzen 7xxx ans onwards. I think they will change the naming scheme again after the 9xxxs now though.

In my case my 5xxx cpu shows avx2 (256bit) in /proc/cpuinfo, I assume you will find avx512 there if you have it.

Also apparently there are mobile and server cpus with 7xxx names that are zen3. It is a mess certainly.

Affected CPUs: AVX-512 capable CPUs. Intel Xeon, Zen 4 AMD Ryzen and EPYC and up.
Affected function: UYVY to YUV422 format conversion (pixel-level color encoding).
Speedup: 18/10.98 = 1.64x (Since all AVX512 cpus should support and previously have used avx2(56)).

Apparently as part of an ongoing series of rewrites, they made a color encoding conversion function run 64% faster on server CPUs and somewhat recent AMD CPUs

Probably only sucessful ones.
Google captchas have had multiple rounds (with it faking you out claiming you failed) for probably a decade. Every round of the game updates some confidence score which if you get it high enough lets you pass.
This conversely means there is no way to fail, you just get stuck in an infinite loop of challenges if your score doesn’t get high enough.

The only other alternative means of pricing it would see even valid users consume way more than one “verification” per actual completed captcha, since so many users have low enough scores to need multiple rounds of captcha even when completing them with perfect accuracy.
I doubt they do this, but if they do it’s a scandal waiting to happen, besides also being very weird for any kind of statistic google certainly offers for their captcha.

Needs a none option for base

They are using the LLVM to optimize the code before it is run by the computer. They say no code runs faster than the one optimized by llvm. Sometimes it doesn’t work after llvm, llvm breaks it.
LLVM reinterprets your entire code and sometimes it interprets wrongly and breaks your undefined behavior smart tricks.
Especially O3 they say does this a lot.
Now that openAI has released O4, hope is that will improve.

Fixed a mediawiki maintenance script via a 2 char change last week.

Where do I find a version of half decent, and how do they compare?

test reply 5

Isn’t beginner++ gonna leave it unchanged?
range(val) iterates from 0 to val-1, so the final i+1 is val

They did this exact thing for csam detection a while back, and were made to stop due to public outcry.
It might have been analyzed locally and before encryption then though, still however without consent of the user and sending problematic results to apple.

It is very realistic that here they would make the device decrypt and check the description against a database and make it send the file and description off for reporting when a match is found.

Was a week when I did it some years ago.
The account is tied to your sim, you effectively confirm it by them forcing you to do the process over mobile data.

They make you associate the device with a functional sim by forcing you to do the process over mobile data.
Presumably they take all the sims IDs, effectively making the limit 1 device per year per unique phone contract including data.
Going by my experiences with prepaid contracts (which got canceled due to low usage) I’d estimate that creates costs of 20€ per unlock in my region.

online via a mobile data connection no less, presumably to allow them to reliably associate the imei to you.

If that is true, how does the brain work?

Call everything you have ever experienced the finite dataset.
Constructing your brain from dna works in a timely manner.
Then training it does too, you get visibly smarter with time, so on a linear scale.

I cannot open that, it shows a login page. Could you post a screenshot of what this is supposed to contain?