Nobody left of center has ever nor will ever assume that Federal Healthcare is “free”. We could fund healthcare for a tenth of what we’re spending on failed DARPA projects and fighter jets that are .00001% faster than their previous generation.
In fact, the government would save money. To that effect, it would be like instituting “free” healthcare.
Healthcare for All is the fiscally responsible option.
The Economist is inherently fascist because it exists both as a product of and to foment capitalism.
Imagine inheriting a disease shitshow and being blamed for how the Second Act plays out.
A single case is not proof and you should know this. It’s an outlier. A substantial majority of people with brain damage have affected function in some form or another. If you can show a statistically significant number of cases I may consider your evidence.
More specifically to your example, they showed an impact to their functioning. In addition a neurosurgeon commented: “The patient was not missing brain, but because the skull is a fixed volume, it cannot expand to accommodate increased pressures so the brain instead gets pushed outwards by the fluid and compressed.”
Feel free to try going anywhere without shoes, I guess.
“able to do anything”
I’m all set up right there, thanks.
Even more importantly: God is omnipotent, which means they don’t make mistakes. A simulation doesn’t imply a higher power that is perfect in every way.
If that’s what you want, why not just get Bomb Rush Cyberfunk? Sega’s just the publisher after all. Since the original team couldn’t get them to agree to a sequel, they made a spiritual successor.
If that’s what you want, why not just get Bomb Rush Cyberfunk? Sega’s just the publisher after all. Since the original team couldn’t get them to agree to a sequel, they made a spiritual successor.
Standing on the shoulders of giants helps you stand taller. Besides, you weren’t necessarily around to experience the star power of their predecessors. You have no idea if they’re actually more successful or not.
That’s where you’re incorrect. Ending a government program hurts those at the bottom, ultimately removing them from becoming earners. They either become homeless or die. This takes away from their potential contributions to society. This lack of support unravels the social fabric and reduces the taxes to the government.
In a modern society, a weak government means no negotiating power on the world stage. It means no group alliances, and no benefits from those alliances.
Social safety nets just make sense.