Proud anti-fascist & bird-person
The Touch of Satan always stuck with me.
Well @neuromancer clearly doesn’t take issue with your ethnostate garbage, so he obviously thinks you’re allies.
That’s the “big tent” you’re taking about, yes?
But conservatives want a big state too, they just claim otherwise. Look how they push rhetoric like “back the blue,” are for abortion restrictions, and want to fund the military above and beyond what it even asks for. Their policies push a soft ethno-state, as far as they think they can get away with.
Again, it’s a meaningless distinction.
Conservatism was a reaction to revolutionary politics, it did not proceed it. Even the name makes it clear that it is a response to action.
Leftism is inherently revolutionary, and conservatism was a response to that.
But back to my original question: why do you think @neuromancer denies that fascists and conservatives make natural allies?
You’re wanting the US to be an ethnostate again then?
Conservatism also borrows from the leftist rhetoric and action though, so that’s not a solid distinction.
They’re both counterrevolutionary in nature; I don’t see the distinction that you do. It appears that they are possibly different in degree instead of kind. This is the “ends” that I refer to: opposition to the liberal revolutions since the 18th century.
Not all conservatives are free market devotees; that’s a modern twist that is not universal.
But you agree that they work to the same ends?
So you’re saying that fascists and conservatives work to similar ends?
Your profile says you’re a conservative and a fascist? @neuromancer said before they’re incompatible, and he’s a conservative.
He also says Lincoln was a conservative.
Why do you both say the opposite? Is conservatism so meaningless that such fundamental differences are just ignored?
Why do you think conservatives deny that fascists are part of their movement when they clearly are?
He’s got you on the ropes LMAO!!
You’re a liar, and you know it.
I added that bit about how you don’t give a fuck about racism. BEFORE YOU EVER REPLIED.
Declare victory and run away: classic Wintermute.
My quote was two sentences later, and referenced the exact part you were talking about.
So funny how you pretend to read it, but only know the quotes that were pulled for you.
However, for the reasons summarized below, we conclude that the evidence does not establish Mr. Biden’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
Cool cool, so we’re using the whole report? Or just the out of context quotes that Fox gave you?
We know you don’t give a fuck about racism, nice red herring there.
It says nothing of the sort:
There is insufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Mr. Biden intentionally retained the classified documents in the EYES ONLY envelope after his term as vice president or caused his staff to do so. Instead, the evidence supports an innocent explanation for the unauthorized retention of those documents.
Are you lying? Or misinformed?
Regardless, you’re still planning to vote for Trump even after you acknowledged that he victimized the American people.
Sure, cowpoke.
I totally believe you.
But you’re still voting for Trump, who victimized Americans according to your own logic.
More dishonest rhetoric. Big surprise there.
So it’s your belief that Trump victimized the American people? And you’re still going to vote for him?
The fbi even said Joe willfully kept the data knowing it was illegal but he’s too impaired to have committed a crime. lol.
This is a lie, you’re just mad that he was exonerated. They never said he kept them “willfully,” and “knowing it was illegal.”
And who let the archives know that Biden had those docs as soon as they were discovered? Moreover, how can you inform someone that you have something if you’re ignorant of that fact?
It’s only “debatable” if you’re special pleading.
Trump knowingly retained documents after he was told by law enforcement to return them.
Biden told the archives that he had the documents and returned them ASAP, letting investigators search his properties.
Trump gave investigators the runaround and moved stuff to avoid detection; and most notably: he was no longer president when he had those documents.
Who was Biden’s victim? The archives didn’t even know he had them until he let them know.
Cool, so if Trump purposefully retained classified data knowing that it was against federal law, then he should be prosecuted too, right?
And not be the GOP nominee?
But if Trump committed a crime he should not be prosecuted?
What crime did Clinton commit, and who were the victims?
I’ve wondered why that line “this is where the fish lives” was in the script for literal decades now.