Mean leftist who believes in magic genders
I refuse to believe Ren and Stimpy was ever a kids show
Too bad it’s so slow paced and boring
Fun fact: Cortana is named after a French sword
Well if the bare minimum is identification, then all you need is a first name and a last name. No gendered pronouns or titles necessary.
A wave must have hit it
In practice, social democracy takes a form of socially managed welfare capitalism
Nazi Germany was modelled on America.
Or we could not have leaders. You know, if leaders are all bad people, let’s get rid of them
I hate to be the one to break this to you but the Berlin Wall fell. Russia is capitalist.
When a conservative says “think of the children”, what they mean is “think of the queer kids that will be outed to their parents and sent to conversion therapy”.
Also porn history is a really good clue to figuring out someone’s sexuality and gender identity. And useful to conservatives for demonizing queer people as sexual deviants. I 100% believe this is an indirect way of harming queer people by outing them and their sexual interests.
So you’re making the argument that if I were a Florida teacher, I introduced myself as Mx Endocrinous, wore nonbinary and trans and gay flag pins, had an it/its pronoun pin, and referred to myself as dronegender, this would all be perfectly legal so long as I didn’t explain what any of these words or symbols meant?
It also kinda makes you feel like shit, but in a really good way.
Been doing some googling. Most stars are dwarf stars, and the habitable band of a red dwarf is so close the tidal forces are way stronger. It might turn out that most habitable planets are tidally locked.
There’s a book called The City In The Middle Of The Night that takes place on a tidally locked planet. It has politics, science fiction, and lesbians.
What about a planet so distant from its star that the day side gets as much light as earth at twilight? 2AU from a sol size star, there should be a quarter as much light during the day. What about there?
Or you need a lawyer to make the very easy case, and the judge to have a shred of integrity.
Why haven’t they tried?
Nah, because of one word. Or. That means no gender for grade 3 and under, OR no gender that’s developmentally inappropriate. So yes, gender pronouns are allowed for the big kids, but not for the little ones.
Introducing yourself as a Mr means informing students you identify as a man.
Also the words man and woman are banned according to law.
Side note:
If marriage is between a man and a woman as Republicans claim, then Mrs is not only a gender identity but also a sexual identity, and is doubly prohibited.
(Arguments that Mrs entails allosexual identity are equally predicated on Republican misconception, in this case lack of understanding of the sex/romance distinction)
Western atheism and antitheism often exist as reactions to Christianity on a factual or ethical basis, while remaining within a Christian cultural and moral context. Historically, Christians and atheists have worked together to attack other religions, such as in the case of the stolen generations in Australia or the cult panic in America. This pattern of behaviour is counterintuitive if you’re culturally Christian (as most atheists are), but from a broader cultural perspective it’s kind of obvious. Christianity and white atheism exist as offshoots of the same history in the same way that Catholicism and Protestantism do.
If you have an actual understanding of pre-roman polytheism, then you’re capable of seeing the difference between belief and worship. A difference Christians have tried to erase, and white atheists have not challenged. Giving up cultural Christianity is beyond most white atheists’ ability to even imagine. What I call cultural Christianity, they would just as soon call “common sense” or “reality”.
Also I’ve never met an antitheist who has spent longer than an hour thinking about whether they’re advocating cultural genocide of indigenous people.