Couldn’t care less.
not my circus not my monkeys
Couldn’t care less.
not my circus not my monkeys
What your Trump-supporting journalist says –
Behind the scenes is China’s reluctance to forgive debt…
In the past under such circumstances, big government lenders such as the U.S., Japan and France would work out deals to forgive some debt, with each lender disclosing clearly what they were owed and on what terms so no one would feel cheated. But China didn’t play by those rules.
The actual facts –
FarraigePlaisteach
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCeyx2I0UL9VNYC8X97SflUg
I’m interested in different perspectives so I’d like to avoid USA, GB etc.
Tá “comm” againn faoi sin: !noyank@lemmy.ml
go get em tiger
knock em dead champ
etc
History doesn’t provide answers to hypotheticals
Nah not really. It was very bomby and gunny in the 20th century, now it seems mostly chill.
Ok, your BBC link has persuaded me to do a 180° on my opinion
A critical mass is needed for major political changes.
For a referendum that’s 50%+1, but for organic political changes I’ve seen, like when my country legalised abortion or gay marriage or stopped The Troubles, you need a broad consensus.
It’s hard to quantify a broad consensus, but it’s certainly not 2 opponents to each proponent.
One third is a small minority as political support goes.
Story didn’t go anywhere
See a GP
I wish I could do original things with my gaff but you gotta be conservative because housing is a commodity.
There’s no mention of Muslims in your link, nor race neither
authoritarianism has worked for thousands of years.