I’m not gonna tell you how to live your life or anything but isn’t the “truthbait” schtick kinda played out by now? The trope’s been done to death, I think you need to get more creative with your parody account

Why are you asking me to defend a stance on not taking again?

She fact checked the shit out of him and straight up laughed at the ridiculous stuff he was saying. She pushed his buttons.

He’s absolutely losing IT - as in his mind. He’s been falling apart since getting shot and you could see him break further during the debate.

Hmmm did I say she won anything? Once again proving your inability to read.

Trump made a fool of himself then went on to say how everyone agrees he won. He rambled about disproven claims and didn’t bring up any real policy. It’s weird how the right thinks acting foolish wins a debate. Anyone that was positively influenced by his debate performance is a fucking moron because that was even more embarrassing than Biden’s debate

Trump didn’t “win” the first debate, but I don’t think that’s why he’s not agreeing to another debate. And I know a lot of people are going to write this off as Trump being scared to debate Kamala Harris again, but I think we all know that’s not the case.

This guy’s opinion isn’t worth hearing if he thinks “we all know” that Trump isn’t scared to do it again. He got rocked by both Harris and himself. It’s like he was a performer doing a parody of Trump. I don’t understand how anyone could watch the debate and think that he’s not losing it.

She knows exactly how to push his buttons. Did you see his face when she made fun of his obsession with crowds? From then on, he did nothing but bury himself further.

He’s scared. And all the Republicans saying he did poorly is triggering him further. His ego can’t take it and we’re watching it slowly tear itself apart.

It looks like an early iOS app that someone installs to act rich. See? It’s gold!

Didn’t answer the question and rambled about something else instead. No wonder you like Trump

“My anti-tiger rock works because I haven’t been attacked by a tiger so it clearly provides stability. If I didn’t have my anti-tiger rock, I would be killed by a tiger within a few years. No thank you.”

You don’t have any reasons why it’s better, I guess. Surprising :)

Nowhere did you explain why it’s better and now you’re continuing to dance around the point.

Quit the bullshit and answer this concisely:

Why is a system where citizens in a few states to have disproportional power better than one where individuals are equal?

And don’t just vaguely gesture at the country again. Worse systems have lasted way longer so “see? It clearly works!” is not a valid argument.

…context?

You can’t read. I’m saying the popular vote is how the president SHOULD be decided and I’m asking in what way the electoral college is better. Your only suggestion so far holds about as much weight as an anti-tiger rock (“we’re still a union so it’s a good thing”)

Typical conservative dancing around the point but not addressing it. Sad!

What does that word salad even mean?

I’m thinking you shouldn’t talk about the electoral college until you understand what it does because you’re dead wrong

Power IS held by a few states…the swing states…that are made important because the electoral college gives them disproportionate votes. States aren’t people and where you live shouldn’t matter for the presidential election.

[https://fairvote.org/archives/the_electoral_college-population_vs_electoral_votes/](A vote in Wyoming has the same “power” as 2 1/2 votes from Oregon). What about that sounds right to you?

…the electoral college keeps the union together…??

No no, it’s CAPABLE of OTA updates to remain up to date. they never promised it would ship up to date

What is superior about it at all? That it gives disproportional voting power to a few states?

The only people who like the electoral college are people who lose the popular vote

No, I would never say something like that!

The people who believe it