Reduce, Reuse, Recycle. I would advise every ody learn how to repair their appliances are part of the Reuse part of that, it means you don’t have to buy as much shit

There are very few options for UK replacements, even Argos is partially owned by Qatar or something like that.

Not to piss on your parade but one of the owners of eBay is BlackRock, and several other private equity firms. There might not be an individual name to hate, but it’s barely better.

I use it more than Amazon myself because of the free shipping, but I still don’t enjoy it

Depends on whether he improves people’s living conditions as well, or if he’s content to just hope potholes will win him success.

Did she actually, or is that just how GB news sang it to you?

This is part of the IHRA definition btw

So we won’t be able to call the racist Nazi state of Israel, a racist Nazi state anymore? That’s antisemitic apparently.

Oh and you also can’t accuse a Jewish person of being more loyal to Israel than the UK. Even if they’re doing that.

1. If it was scrapped it would be unfair on neighbouring nations. Especially ridiculous considering the UK is one of the countries that was actively involved in destabilising the middle East.
2. How are they grifters? They apply for asylum. If they get it, they’re the real deal. If they don’t, they’re deported. What’s there to oppose there?
3. Context is relevant. If you care about spending, why care about asylum spending more than oil subsidies?
4. You talk about resettlement programs and how they’re a good way of doing things. How about the countries who destabilised these nations, takes on those seeking asylum? In which case Turkey should bear zero Afghan or Iraqi immigrants, and the western world should bear all of them. Or does it only work one way, in your mind?

Overall I am under no illusions that immigration is an issue in the UK, and is simply being peddled by those who run our media and economy, in order to distract people from real concrete issues like corruption, collusion, homelessness, poverty, etc. like they distracted you.

Aaaaand there it is.

According to the UN convention on the treatment of refugees:

1. There is no “legally acceptable” way to travel to a safe country. Ergo dinghys are acceptable
2. There is no limitations on how many safe countries you can travel THROUGH before applying for asylum status. As long as you apply for asylum status.

In addition:

• Asylum spending is 0.25% of the budget. Oil subsidies are 2%. Priorities?
• Asylum seekers are not entitled to regular UK benefits. They get treated as asylum seekers, i.e. they can’t work, have to stay in a hotel (certainly not nice ones), and basically are treated like 2nd class citizens until they have been here long enough to be considered “allowed to work”, which used to be 2 years, they were considering upping it to 5 years. Which is dumb.

So please for the love of the gods, educate yourself, and be less hateful.

The third paragraph sounds like you’re opposing immigration

Please fuck right off with the anti-immigration sentiment. I got enough of that when I was on Reddit.

How do? Does this apply even if it’s a locally run LLM? Even if it’s done using green energy like Mistral? Even if all of the AI written code is carefully reviewed by professionals?

Is it a problem of making it too easy for people? If so, what is the correct amount of easiness for people? Shall we start taking clothing down to the river to scrub instead of using washing machines too?

Andy Burnham will most certainly not be making significant changes to our capitalist state. We will continue to have homelessness, poverty, and rising cost of living, regardless of his policies. This is because we fundamentally have a state that is intertwined with capitalism, and this beholden to it.

We are unable to shrug of these concepts you list until capitalism ends. they are a feature of capitalism, not a bug. It exists to consolidate the power of capitalists, and will continue to do so forever, until it ends.

If you want a real democracy in which people have real power over matters of politics and economics, you want socialism.

Rotisserie chicken gang

Get this fucking shite out of here.

People insistent on keeping up with daily reports on small boat crossings are fucking ill, and desperately need therapy, and to go outside.

This is exactly it. The American economy is riding on a semi-permanent high of being the dominant economic power of the entire world, especially since the USSR fell. They maintain this with a combination of military power and economic power, projected globally.

Copying that simply will never garner the same results

This is what happens when you have a country trying to become more American over time. We want European public services with American tax rates. What we’ve ended up with is American public services, and American tax rates, but with none of the political or economic power of America. The economy is hampered by the privatisation of necessities.

However, I also think comparing with America is disingenuous. I’d much rather live in a country where my government is semi-competent, versus one where it is totally incompetent. You couldn’t pay me to live in America.

I would argue facilitating somebody else’s offensive action, is an offensive action. If I encourage my friend to punch somebody else, I have participated in the attack, and therefore have committed an offensive action. Debating over culpability here is ridiculous, the man who loads the bombs is just as culpable as the man who drops them.

In the same way that doing admin for Auschwitz is not taking offensive action, sure…