The fact that this comment is getting upvoted is why I fucking hate this place.
The fact that this comment is getting upvoted is why I fucking hate this place.
But there is no public debate commission, and no public funding going to these debates. It’s two campaigns making a deal with a private TV network to show them on TV arguing with each other. Should there be a public debate commission? And if there were, would it be appropriate to feature more candidates? Maybe! But as is, the only real issue is that the vast majority of the public does not care about these candidates.
The debate is literally an agreement between Donald trump and kamala Harris. There is no neutral debate commission involved. This doesn’t really make sense.
Those candidates are free to have their own debate if they think they can convince someone to put them on TV.
Edit: Also is Jill Stein a “moderate”?
Investors don’t invest based on the quality of games they put out, they invest on how much profit they make.
Do you really buy stuff based off of steam recommendations to begin with?
Review bombing games that you haven’t played is great! Really useful for people.
This is a very uninformed response that seems to be based on nothing more than “I don’t like business people.”
Like I said, they’re mostly scams. Warranty scams. Posing as “your bank” (which they, of course, don’t name). Etc. Legitimate companies follow the do not call list, since there are heavy penalties if they don’t.
A lot of people who obviously didn’t go to business school commenting on this post. Case studies make up quite a bit of business classes.
Or we could use a combination of letters, sometimes referred to as a word, to represent it.
The US has a do not call list. The vast majority of robocalls are illegal scams which originate from outside of the country.
I think they’re just saying that hero shooters are a genre that saw a big boom around when overwatch came out but are now no longer trending.
XKCD 149 but worse.
Don’t think I’ve ever actually heard a company say “forget everything you learned in college”.
But a lot of developers do do exactly that. They not only distribute binaries on their github, it is the only place where they distribute binaries. Github should probably recognize that it is a common use case and accommodate it better.
I’m also sure that a lot of people, like myself, took no notice of what specific package this user was complaining about, and are simply agreeing with the general sentiment that github could make things easier for non-technical users (which would, in turn, make it easier for developers since they would not need to field questions from users about how they download the software).
To strain your metaphor, I think what most people are looking for is a sign that says “FOOD COURT THIS WAY ->”
If they just had a prominent link to “download latest stable version” in a consistent place, people wouldn’t be so confused (and devs wouldn’t have to do extra work to try and make it obvious).
So what, if RCS becomes the standard I’m going to lose the ability to choose what messaging app I use? I very much don’t like that.
Enjoying palworld quite a bit despite bugs, and the input (and money) will probably make the end product a better game. BG3 is another example of a game that was wildly successful due to EA.
I’ll judge these on a case by case basis. But I think the issue is less EA titles and more titles that are released not as EA but obviously broken.
So literally fake news is OK on here?
People don’t like that they’re wanting them to log into a psn account. But otherwise the ports are fine and the games are great (if you like the kinds of games that they make).