Kane

Exactly this is why I have a love/hate relationship with just about any LLM.

I love it most for generating code samples (small enough that I can manually check them, not entire files/projects) and re-writing existing text, again small enough to verify everything. Common theme being that I have to re-read its output a few times, to make 100% sure it hasn’t made some random mistake.

I’m not entirely sure we’re going to resolve this without additional technology, outside of ‘the LLM’-itself.

What if they do meet, but then like different shows? 🥸

Everyone with ETFs targeting US stocks sweating right now

“Putin will now be forced to decide whether to conclude a temporary ceasefire or risk souring relations with the White House under the new Trump administration.”

Honestly wonder if they’d care at all. I really hope there can at least be a breather for a minute, even if it is short lived.

While you may be right, it’s irrelevant if you say it with such a tone. Additionally, it’s quite clear OP means predatory forms of algorithms.

2026 will definitely be my year

Not a home owner yet, but I just purchased a home and waiting on the handover.

This post has been really helpful! Certainly in writing some stuff down to remember 😅

I thought after s2 of Discovery, something exactly like that was already a thing?

Or am I misremembering, it’s been a while.