Correlation or causation? You know that industrialization increases life expectancy, right?
It’s not hard to double your life expectancy when you’re starting out with the same life expectancy that existed in the Roman Empire almost 2,000 years prior. Thanks, Mao!
Mao died in 1976, which is where that life expectancy graph is somewhere in the mid 50s. Super impressive.
Deng was alive and well when two of those stock exchanges were opened and the whole argument was “look at the improvements only possible under Communism”.
How do you say “moving the goalposts” in Mandarin? Actually, no need to answer as you are all suburban petit bourgeois kids from the US.
Communism increasing life expectancy!?
Shanghai Stock Exchange: http://english.sse.com.cn/
Beijing Stock Exchange: www.bse.cn
Shenzhen Stock Exchange: https://www.szse.cn/English/index.html
That’s more stock exchanges than the US, comrade!
Milton Friedman and Ayn Rand. In Fountainhead, she goes in depth about how Chinese life expectancy statistics are generally made up.
I would expect you to understand unless you’ve read theory.
China never manipulates data coming out of their authoritarian country so good thing we can trust it. I’m sure their life expectancy is great with all their industrial pollution that regularly causes smog in their inner cities.
Celebrating an increase in life expectancy from 30 to 40 years old is not remotely the win you think it is.
An aggressive communist with no sense of how the world works could be a child? You’re the most self aware Hexbear user.
Also lol to “dude chill”. I’m not the one fantasizing about murdering people.
She would make a great staffer in the Lubyanka.
Here’s a comment thread where a Hexbear user said “I hope to kill people like you” because I simply said I supported democratic socialism.
Going on any Hexbear instance people froth over telling anyone right of Karl Marx to “get up against the wall”. You guys are, and will always be, a joke.
This post is the natural reaction to a failed dunk. Perhaps if you want to counter a controversial point without explaining it, don’t bother posting otherwise it’s the intellectual equivalent of “no, u”.
You see, the comment sections of divisive posts are a place that you can learn about opinions different than your own or to learn new things. If you want, I can go back to the neoliberal echo chambers where people are actually engaged in discussing things in good faith.
I don’t have a stance on Trotsky. Maybe you should check who you are responding to before you automatically start “dunking on libs”.
If you spent more time explaining things rather than “dunking on libs” maybe your movement would be less on the fringe. I don’t have an opinion on who is more authoritarian, which is why it was obnoxious that you matter-of-factly made your point without any substance.
Why post statements in the form of a question?
I’m glad you could enlighten us with a post that doesn’t bother to explain anything.
Let’s get grandma running Gentoo!
So you agree it has nothing to do with communism and you’re just trolling around the internet. Got it.