Then it would be a total loss. Nothing’s out there.

deleted by creator

It’s not over 'til it actually sinks. If they can tow it back to port, it might be repairable instead of a total loss.

Why is that humorous? The googles do nothing.

Here is the building on Street View:

https://www.google.com/maps/@51.3903071,1.3975333,3a,75y,282.44h,90.36t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sBPGlvvqDEEojlxpXH1SP5Q!2e0!5s20150701T000000!7i13312!8i6656?entry=ttu

It’s been knocked down and replaced since 2015.

I would suggest shijw as an abbreviation.

It’s generally a bad idea to create fake Google accounts, if you have a primary account you don’t want banned.

I listed the 5 possible digits. What’s missing?

IPv6 subnet masks are long, but super easy because of hexadecimal. A bunch of Fs, then [EC8]? then a bunch of 0s.

https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/family-laughing-at-crying-child-opening-christmas-present

That includes some history, but not the prompt itself.

Let’s rename New Delhi to Indiapolis.

Data centers […] have traditionally relied on renewable sources like solar and wind

I don’t think that’s really true. The green/grey graphs in this article show how difficult that is: https://www.canarymedia.com/articles/clean-energy/google-and-others-have-committed-to-24-7-carbon-free-energy-what-does-that-mean

Here’s a presentation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OAB6Xh8L1kk

They’re basically generating weird patterns that manipulate light to project a very precise shadow.

It’s not about how people write them, it’s how parsers parse them. IPv4 has been around since 1982, and most parsers interpret leading zeros as octal.

Because 1.2.3.4 and 1.02.003.04 both map to the same number.

But 10.20.30.40 and 010.020.030.040 map to different numbers. It’s often best to reject IPv4 addresses with leading zeroes to avoid the decimal vs. octal ambiguity.