Porksnort enjoys laying in the sunshine. Porksnort will not refuse any offer of a snack. Porksnort thinks ‘Christian’ means you have thought a lot about how to live according to the words Jesus apparently actually said.

  • 0 Posts
  • 39 Comments
Joined 4 months ago
cake
Cake day: August 13th, 2025

help-circle








  • I understand and have analogous experiences presenting nuanced details to support one position or another. That’s the crappy part about open forums, they are open and much of the audience won’t or can’t give any attention to the arguments you make.

    Your experience also shows that part of the audience does pay attention, however.

    The only thing that helps me keep trying to learn and teach things important to me is managing my own expectations about what I expect to happen when I expound online.

    I am setting myself up for certain disappointment if I don’t admit most won’t even read the words, some will have an emotional reaction and go off on their own tangent, and a few, a very few, may engage in a way that helps me learn more, too.

    Most of my professional experience is in ‘science’ and R&D. You have to learn (at least) two completely different communication styles in these fields.

    In a closed community of specialists, you need easy access to all the details as well as clear presentation of the grander vision that motivates the work.

    In a more general setting, soundbites and punchy anecdotes are more persuasive. Too much detail brings out the cranks, who then generate so much noise your message gets lost.

    In summary, if you really want people to hear you and engage with your ideas, I have learned:

    Be extremely clear with yourself about your intended audience.

    Be clear with yourself what results you can reasonably expect from that audience.

    Brace yourself to just ignore the distracting peanut gallery, not every reply needs a response. Only engage with substantive replies that appear to be good faith.

    Be prepared to have your mind changed too.


  • Yeah, people get super jerky sometimes. It’s easy to get frustrated when contending in vain against stupidity.

    However, if someone, say you maybe, were to make a post that presented a nuanced view of where these technologies are useful and how they are being misapplied, lemmy is one place where you could get a super productive discussion going.

    When the community is called ‘fuckai’ or similar, the deck is stacked against a good discussion happening.

    One can rail against reactionary behavior but that is reactionary behavior!

    It is hard to ‘be the change one wants to see’ but it’s really the only thing one can do. I know I often try to be that change, but I get lazy too and it’s so easy to make fun of tech bros.




  • I love OpenSCAD and also realize it is a super backward way to make 3D models, according to most other people. I don’t bother even mentioning OpenScad as an option for most people, I know it is only for certain people.

    I tried my hand at modeling and designing using more traditional CAD programs that work more visually. I have good spatial reasoning and visualization abilities but I could never get the breakthrough to a point where I felt literate in those tools.

    Constructive Solid Geometry approaches just work for my brain. Now when I need a part designed, I can quickly sketch it out in rough code and I feel confident seeing myself as a ‘designer’ now. Other more ‘visual’ tools waste my time as I get sucked into finger painting instead of working out the fundamentals of the design.

    With the code-first framework, I have to really think about what the part needs to do before I tweak the code.