I find it quite difficult to properly define the differences between the two.

The handling is enforced by one while the other may be unknown to the person who calls the function. I think that’s a pretty clear difference.

Oh okay, are you referring to the Amazon link in the description? That link is a generic affiliate link that just redirects to “laptop” but gives him a comission when someone buys something on Amazon after, it’s not a specific product he sells on there.

It didn’t happen in the US though, so I’m not sure why that’s relevant.

I’m sorry, but what are you referring to?

Interesting. Is that because the kernel can’t load a a module as dylib (I don’t know a lot about kernel development) or because dylibs are also somehow statically linked in Rust?

deleted by creator

I still wonder why they decided to write their own UI framework from scratch.

Rider can do code replacement too and has worked much better in my experience

The company I work for loves Azure. If it’s not available as an Azure service it won’t be used (except for uptime kuma). Some time ago there was a global Azure outage and we could do literally nothing. All tasks and code were on Azure Devops and all communication went through Teams and Outlook.

The webhook integration has also recently been removed from Teams so uptime kuma also didn’t work for like a week until it was fixed by using Azure’s automation service.

I must say, being able to create, build, and bootstrap your kernel and run it in a VM with 3 commands is pretty cool.

Our choice of the weak-copyleft MPL license reflects a strategic balance:

1. Commitment to open-source freedom: We believe that OS kernels are a communal asset that should benefit humanity. The MPL ensures that any alterations to MPL-covered files remain open source, aligning with our vision. Additionally, we do not require contributors to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA), preserving their rights and preventing the possibility of their contributions being made closed source.

2. Accommodating proprietary modules: Recognizing the evolving landscape where large corporations also contribute significantly to open-source, we accommodate the business need for proprietary kernel modules. Unlike GPL, the MPL permits the linking of MPL-covered files with proprietary code.

Wouldn’t the LGPL also allow this?

Some people (like me) like having a more compact layout

A classmate I was doing a project with saved his code as screenshots in a word document.

It’s great for explaining entry level information on a wide variety of topics. More advanced / obscure topics are more prone to hallucinations. I used it to learn React and it was a great introduction.

There are only 7 unit test classes. 2 of which I wrote myself this month.

I already did so an hour ago

UPDATE: It has been merged

Found it while refactoring KDE Connect Android.

My neighbor was practicing with a trumpet at 1 am last night.

All the mods are written with Lua and run in a sandbox afaik so it isn’t really the same as Minecraft mods

Many programs use SQLite internally and McAfee decided to store the database files in C:/Temp