You should read the paper before posting it, This paper is clearly pro puberty blockers, while it is true that it is saying that trans women loses some bone density because of the treatment it is never clarified if they loses bone density for a male, thus having a female’s bone density or even if they lack bone density at all. And even if that was the case … What problems would it bring ? A slight increase in the probability of breaking your arm?

They clearly say that the reward outweight the risk “Concerns about skeletal losses become less significant in an adolescent with active suicidal ideations. While the significance of the risks may be unclear, there is strong evidence regarding the benefits of GnRHa in transgender youth: it can be a life-changing and lifesaving treatment for a vulnerable population who is at high risk for anxiety, depression, and suicide”

Can you link a study about possible negative side effect of puberty blocker ? Because each time i check i find that it only pause puberty and they only need to stop taking them to go through it. Which would mean that there is no problem letting children decide if they want to take puberty blockers , as the effect is reversable ?

Nope you were right, i forgot to add the old french part, thanks for the catch :)

Not in modern french but it was in old french :)

My best guess would be that saintclair’s prononciation was influenced by french, as in french the “t” is pronounced while st john might be more “english”, leading to the “t” being silent