

What’s fucking ridiculous, is that any industry could not have to report water usages. Let alone an environmental disaster area like AI.
What’s fucking ridiculous, is that any industry could not have to report water usages. Let alone an environmental disaster area like AI.
That’s my point about permissiveness, if the rights weren’t there about self identifying, but everyone’s ok with it, then it feels like more rights, which may or may not be supported in law. But then when a lack of support in law is being enforced by bad feeling alone, people who want to cry about who’s using which toilet, then the end result is that it feels like a loss of rights. I think it’s a bad thing, but I also understand that in law, being able to do something without a fuss, and then later not being able to, is nothing to do with rights unless the law actually changed.
Misleading title, they’re apparently not reducing rights, they’re communicating that the rights have not changed, but assumptions were incorrectly made and it ‘feels like reduced rights’. It’s not a nice thing to learn and needs to be handled carefully and compassionately, even a policy to be permissive and encourage to normalise what the assumed increase in rights were, working towards making them actual rights. But yeah, antagonistic headlines as always.
Is anyone surprised that any of this isn’t just to make their rich mates richer?
I was always rock/metal/grunge/alternative/thrash and so on in interests, so punk was not a bit of me, only the big names with tracks in the charts I ever noticed, so I missed these guys completely.
The article assumes we know who they are. Who are they?
Paywall that isn’t side stepped by reader mode
Use reader mode and side step it
I mean, written a little anti-establishment, but you’re completely right, the ‘producer’ slip issued to bring your documents in has been standard stuff for decades and all of the digital info is available to them as soon as they stop you, so it’s literally just proving your face matches the documents to have it with you. If they just had your mug pop up on the screen in their car, who would need to produce anything?
I don’t see the problem, if you’ve ever used the hmrc tax app, it’s completely fine.
However, it has not yet passed UK road safety tests.
GMP said the car that was seized had been referred to Operation Wolverine, which was established in 2007 to target drivers without insurance.
The owner will have to prove ownership and correct insurance prior to release.
So even if insurance was proven, not sure how for an illegal vehicle, it could be released, but it couldn’t be driven, so knowing the way our authorities work; get this vehicle collected, on a transporter of some kind and get it out of our compound by xx date or we’ll crush it.
OECD Because as funny as let me Google that for you is, damn the search results on Google suck. Duck duck go’s first result is this link. Far far better
Chichester, do I win five pounds?
I think Elon muskrat is an absolute bell end, but the push to drive (pun intended) motorists towards non-ICE driven vehicles is a good thing, but the profit Tesla wants to get from this should be murdered at birth; no credits for companies that do not produce vehicles in the U.K.
That’ll help.