It’s not my definition. It is the definition that is being used in context in the article. Read it before commenting

The definition being used is proper and common in modern usage.

That is correct. They might work, but in context they are not “working people”

Here “working people” is synonymous with “working class”. Thus, not landlords and shareholders obviously

“News”

Should be called the Central Nothing Network

That Romanian oligarch needs to get a new HR department if he thinks Hunter will influence anything other than a bottle of Scotch and straw in his nostril

Well…no pain, no Jackass

Missing the, literally, punch

Removed by mod

Thank you for the clarification. I had no idea

Thanks. Did not get it

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/craven

Doesn’t “craven” mean “coward”

There be some big brains at Sony

Edit: Not a Sony character, but a character from the sixties