Is he actually a bad play caller? Or are you saying that because you assume so? You don’t have to have success on every drive to be a successful play caller, not every team is cashing out every drive
Our offense stops producing, like flat out not scoring and can’t move the ball, whenever we have a lead in the second half. At one time people blamed that on Kirk, but now it’s the same with Dobbs at QB.
Here is a good example, we beat the 49ers and people were saying “but KOC is still clueless in the redzone” as well as “he’s too conservative”
This is a good “play call” ON THIRD DOWN, and players were open almost everywhere. It resulted in a drop / mid throw and we decided to go for a FG.
Players are open, players didn’t execute and KOC gets a bad tittle
Why would you go for it after drawing up the perfect play and players failing.
If players aren’t executing, you have no reason to go ultra aggressive as well as call a more aggressive game that has more “risk”. The play calling on a lot of plays are there, he’s getting guys open, it’s the overall execution (catching, throwing, running, holding on to the ball, and blocking). Adjusting to a college style playbook is gonna get you fired and isn’t sustainable.
Calling 2 runs to start a drive is not a bad idea, its actually what most coaches would do, unless you are the Chiefs. Run game going = more success.
This is an example I am talking about when it comes yo labels and film. I am asking you , have you watched at least 50% of the film or are you just saying KOC is a bad play caller?
Yes, I understand that, and I’m asking you is that because of BAD PLAYCALLING, or bad execution as a team? And if it’s due to bad play calling like you said it was, is that because players aren’t getting open?
Our offense stops producing, like flat out not scoring and can’t move the ball, whenever we have a lead in the second half. At one time people blamed that on Kirk, but now it’s the same with Dobbs at QB.
Picture of bird eye view
Here is a good example, we beat the 49ers and people were saying “but KOC is still clueless in the redzone” as well as “he’s too conservative”
This is a good “play call” ON THIRD DOWN, and players were open almost everywhere. It resulted in a drop / mid throw and we decided to go for a FG.
Players are open, players didn’t execute and KOC gets a bad tittle
Why would you go for it after drawing up the perfect play and players failing.
If players aren’t executing, you have no reason to go ultra aggressive as well as call a more aggressive game that has more “risk”. The play calling on a lot of plays are there, he’s getting guys open, it’s the overall execution (catching, throwing, running, holding on to the ball, and blocking). Adjusting to a college style playbook is gonna get you fired and isn’t sustainable.
Calling 2 runs to start a drive is not a bad idea, its actually what most coaches would do, unless you are the Chiefs. Run game going = more success.
This is one play. The trend I am talking about is through 29 games.
This is an example I am talking about when it comes yo labels and film. I am asking you , have you watched at least 50% of the film or are you just saying KOC is a bad play caller?
I’m saying that KOC’s Vikings don’t move the ball or score when they have a lead in the 4th quarter.
Yes, I understand that, and I’m asking you is that because of BAD PLAYCALLING, or bad execution as a team? And if it’s due to bad play calling like you said it was, is that because players aren’t getting open?