Truth be told, I don’t know who should start at QB, so this post is in no way meant to be a case for why Mullens to start over Dobbs or Hall. I think there are valid arguments for all three, but a portion of the fanbase seems to be excessively sour on Mullens, which is shocking to me. The guy has reliably demonstrated the ability to operate an NFL offense throughout his entire career. He has the 11th most passing yards for a player ever in their first 16 starts. That’s not to say he’s a hall of famer, or that he’ll be great, but he wouldn’t be a bad option moving forward.

  • PlaneCapable7399B
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I honestly could understand whatever decision is made. Nick has twice held down the fort for a team half the season. With decent personal success. Hall is the unknown, so technically the upside is limitless there. Then dobbs even after a terrible game is still 15th in qbr in the nfl. That’s not bad at all for a dude you grabbed at the deadline. I don’t envy KOC for having this decision to mull over this week.