The frustration is because we tanked last year and it’s not good to tank…but Now we got victor and fans want to not tank.

But if we are honest spurs patfo are tanking again

Is it right? will it work? both good questions

Is it right? Probably as we need a point guard, you say, but We need a veteran point guard, so I am going to say no. We definitely should have gone for chris Paul, or any other veteran point guard, maybe even rose. Who it is, is not the point of this.

Not to win now Just for team development Sochan can still learn the point, it’s a good idea, But a cp3 would have helped him and victor and everyone. you can’t develop everyone at once it’s counterproductive

look at how cp3 helped the warriors

Will tanking work in the long run? I think no See answer above We don’t need a rookie point guard Rookies these days are 19 low on the draft. We need a veteran for wemby to make it a bit easier for him. He has enough to learn, so making it easier is paramount

There is no sense in developing several pieces at once, you need up with chaos.

Look at houston They had the same soup of Rookies developing and it was a mess Insert two veterans amd boom you have something. Doesn’t have to win now but it provides the framework for development.

So yes the spurs fucked up with this oh we will wait and see garbage. That was nonsense. They wanted to tank again, low key But it is frustrating and I honestly think it is making wemby development much much harder

He needs to have some stability whilst he is learning everything

He got thrown in the deep end not giving him a point guard to help him learn stuff.

We don’t need to win now, but we do need a structured development, not let’s see what we got, even though we know it won’t work, oh we got a low draft pick fancy that.

That’s trash

  • deneuvigB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    They’re not tanking, just building upon the youngest roster in the league, young teams are bad. Just chill it’ll be alright