I believe it’s due to the government threatening to take away certain tax advantages if Tesla didn’t allow SC to other manufacturers, but from a business perspective, doing so just gave away Tesla’s main advantage.
When people say Tesla has better EV tech, what do they mean? Is it the better phone app? I’m genuinely trying to understand. Isn’t the battery used in Tesla cars the same Panasonic or CATL batteries that are used in other EVs such as Audi, VW, Mercedes, Toyota, and ect?
The main advantage with buying an EV from legacy manufacturers is that you get better build quality and more comfortable ride. That’s why I’m curious why Tesla gave away its main advantage by allowing SC access to other manufacturers.
- MatchingTurretBEnglish1·1 year ago
- Money now: I’m pretty sure the manufacturers getting access to the SC network have to pay a contribution to its expansion.
- It goes both ways: With NACS becoming indeed the North American Charging Standard, Tesla drivers get access to all other charging networks that support the standard.
- Long term money: Over time Tesla’s market share will fall. If they retain 20…25% after the EV transition is over, that will be a huge accomplishment. With an open SC network, they can make money from the other 75…80% of the market.