Hello, Knicks fans,

I will preface this with saying that I have autism and am very intrigued with the history of basketball. I am doing some initial research while developing a thesis for my masters degree.

I’ve been pondering the current state of the NBA and how it compares to different eras, and I’d love to get your thoughts on this. As we all know, the NBA has gone through various phases - from times when a few dominant teams reigned supreme to the current era where there seems to be more parity across the league.

The Era of Dominance: In the past, the NBA often had a handful of powerhouse teams that would almost inevitably end up facing each other, creating some legendary rivalries and memorable playoff series. These teams were often stacked with star players, and their dominance added a certain predictability to the league, but also a sense of awe in their excellence.

The Era of Parity: Contrast that with today’s NBA, where it feels like there’s more balance and unpredictability. More teams have a shot at making a deep playoff run, and there’s a sense that on any given night, any team can win. This parity has arguably made the league more exciting and has given fans of more teams a reason to hope and dream.

Discussion Points:

  1. Parity vs. Dominance - Personal Preferences: Do you prefer the current state of parity in the NBA, or do you miss the days of dominant teams and rivalries? How does this change in league dynamics affect your experience as a fan?
  2. Impact on Big Market Teams like the Knicks: Considering the Knicks are a big market team, how does the current era of parity affect our strategies for team building? Historically, big market teams have had advantages in attracting star players. Do you think this advantage is lessened in an era of greater parity?
  3. The Salary Cap and Its Influence on Player Movement: How do you view the current salary cap structure in terms of its impact on the league’s parity? Is the NBA in an artificial cycle driven by the salary cap, where struggling small-market teams draft superstars who eventually leave for bigger markets or to join other stars, thus reinforcing the disparity?
  4. Long-Term Implications for the Knicks: How should the Knicks navigate this landscape? Should they focus on developing talent internally, or aggressively pursue star players in hopes of quickly building a championship contender?
  5. League Health and Fan Engagement: Do you believe that this era of parity is good for the NBA’s overall health and fan engagement? How does this impact the fandom of teams that are traditionally not as strong?

I’m curious to hear your thoughts on this. Do you enjoy the unpredictability of the current NBA or the legendary rivalries we’ve seen in the past?

    • SirGingerbruteBEnglish
      1·
      1 year ago

      Yes this is by far the worst subreddit ever.

      Whenever I defend Julius Randle I’m Downvoted.

      Whenever I say Brunson is not a Top 10 PG I’m downvoted

      Knicks fans do not live in reality, Knicks fans are delusional. It’s toxic when we’re bad and it’s more toxic when we are good.

      For a team as bad as we have been for the last 25 years, you’d think some fans would be grateful for the Julius Randle era, but it’s the opposite. People want our front office fired, they want Randle traded.

      We are having our best start in a decade, made playoffs 2 times in the last 3 years, and entering November 2023 we were the WORST team since 2000. (Now 2nd worst).

      I am so happy with how the Knicks are performing but half this sub is angry all the time and hates our Superstar PF