Grand Slam Titles: 24 (next closest is Nadal at 22)
Grand Slam Finals: 36 (next closest is Federer at 31)
Grand Slam Semifinals: 47 (next closest is Federer 46)
Masters Titles: 40 (next closest is Nadal at 36)
Career Win %: 83.7% (next closest is Nadal at 82.9%)
Wins over top 10: 257 (next closest is Federer at 224)
YEC: 7 (next closest is Federer at 6)
YEN1: 8 (next closest is Sampras at 6)
Weeks at N1: 409 (next closest is Federer at 310)
Career Slams: 3 (next closest is Nadal at 2)
3-slam seasons: 4 (next closest is Federer at 3)
2-slam seasons: 7 (next closest is Nadal/Federer at 6)
Cons. Slams Titles: 4 (tied with Laver at 4)
Golden Masters: 2 (Others zero)
Big Titles: 71 (next closest is Nadal at 59)
Prize Money: $176M (next closest is Nadal at $134M)
genuinely asking, would weaker competition be a valid argument? seems like even in Federer and Nadal’s heyday, there are still other players that are winning alongside them. doesn’t seem to be the case with Djokovic. the past 4-5 years, there haven’t been anyone that can challenge him?