Grand Slam Titles: 24 (next closest is Nadal at 22)

Grand Slam Finals: 36 (next closest is Federer at 31)

Grand Slam Semifinals: 47 (next closest is Federer 46)

Masters Titles: 40 (next closest is Nadal at 36)

Career Win %: 83.7% (next closest is Nadal at 82.9%)

Wins over top 10: 257 (next closest is Federer at 224)

YEC: 7 (next closest is Federer at 6)

YEN1: 8 (next closest is Sampras at 6)

Weeks at N1: 409 (next closest is Federer at 310)

Career Slams: 3 (next closest is Nadal at 2)

3-slam seasons: 4 (next closest is Federer at 3)

2-slam seasons: 7 (next closest is Nadal/Federer at 6)

Cons. Slams Titles: 4 (tied with Laver at 4)

Golden Masters: 2 (Others zero)

Big Titles: 71 (next closest is Nadal at 59)

Prize Money: $176M (next closest is Nadal at $134M)

  • ThylowZB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    There is no statistic argument against Novak. Tbf he has even drastically improved his weak point which was the net game which was mediocre at best for 90% of his career. I’ve seen him doing things at the net over the course of the last 2 years I had never seen in his game.

    But personally I still feel that RF is the greatest player I’ve ever seen. That’s all. There isn’t any argument for it. I’m not talking about achievements, but just raw feeling and tennis skills assessment. On one day, at peak level, I’d pick RF over Djokovic any day, especially on decently fast paced courts where he was way tougher to beat.

    I totally admit that this goes against all statistics and logic. I won’t argue RF is the GOAT. But he is my GPOAT.

  • NickyGiB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    It will be official when Nadal retires. Theoretically Nadal can win all 4 Grand Slams next year, 5 Masters, ATP Finals and Olympic Gold.

  • da_SENtinelB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Weakest grass era of all time gave him bonus Wimbledons

  • AdComprehensive7879B
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    genuinely asking, would weaker competition be a valid argument? seems like even in Federer and Nadal’s heyday, there are still other players that are winning alongside them. doesn’t seem to be the case with Djokovic. the past 4-5 years, there haven’t been anyone that can challenge him?

  • costnersaccentB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I’d say Federer’s 6 ATP finals, Olympic silver, and weeks at number 1 gives him the edge over Nadal’s two slams, Olympic gold and 8 masters tbh.

  • 614981630B
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    There’s none, genuinely. Unless other bring the same kind of feelings that I did when Novak was the one trailing in stats in 2015. No need to make these pointless posts anymore. Enjoy the tennis.

  • muradinnerB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Simple answer: There is none.

    Other answer: Go see posts by the mental gymnastic masters such as WhitneyNadal, serioussinner, etc. on this sub.

  • SodiumBoy7B
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Novak’s last few grand slams have been against weak Era, still numbers doesn’t lie, he has 2 more grandslam than Nadal, so he is the goat 🐐

  • BonoahxB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Yeah we get it, this is like me going to r/science and constantly posting “What is the argument against the Earth being round?”

  • BigSillyDaisyB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I think the main argument I see everywhere is “I don’t like him”.

    Source: I don’t like him. But I do think it’s pretty obvious to everyone that he is the greatest of all time… SO FAR.

  • 881528B
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    For me its his behaviour, how he handles situations, his medical timeouts, his tactics, his sneaky ways. I respect all his achievements and everything but for me its Rafa and Roger because they are truly a sportsmen for me from behaviour to style or personality.

  • timb1223B
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is the year that it became indisputable. No arguments left unless Rafa pulls off a miracle next year.