Can this sub remind me again how many of you were boycotting this game?

CoD players are doing battle with Pokemon players to see who can get a worse game made.

I don’t know why but these stats just read as carefully worded statements where what they are saying is technically true but at the same time it doesn’t mean the game is actually doing better if that makes sense

More hours per player doesn’t mean more players, it just means those that are there are playing longer, which is worse than having more people playing slightly less

They’re laughing at the people who gave them bad reviews

These stats are all time spent on a per player basis, not totals. Sounds to me like they had to cook up some stats to try and make this release look good. I could see it making sense that per player engagement would be really high if sales are really bad. What if only the hardcore fans that buy every installment are getting this? Wouldn’t that be the group of people that’s most likely to spend a bunch of time playing the game?

Сhanged a number in the name.

Wait…

wouldn’t player time per player be, umm, 1:1?

“Records we track are ones that look good but not the ones we want breaking”.

“better than the last 2 games”…ok what about from the OG MW?..whats that bag and tape for?

I mean it’s so obvious why the they going into such weird metrics in their promotional thing lol - the only explanation that I think anyone would have looking at this is that the game is not doing good!

Gamers are easily the most exploitable population.

You know it’s way easier to just not buy games and save yourself a lot of frustration.

Yes, trust the publisher on their “data” :)

CoD players are doing battle with Pokemon players to see who can get a worse game made.

There are 3 kinds of lies:

Lies

Damned lies

Statistics

Can this sub remind me again how many of you were boycotting this game?