That’s crazy. When we talk about this guy, I think it’s an important thing to remember. Whether or not you think he is mistake/ fumble prone, this stat suggests his vision, burst and therefore, lack of explosive play factor, is as bad as many here think. Maybe we don’t use him correctly, or maybe he is just bad. I don’t know. But you could see a clear difference in both Chandler and Akers’ acceleration and change of direction speed when they were on the field imo. As much as he seems to be a good person, I think he is a sub par running back.

  • des_deployB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I KNOW DUDE WE NEED TO START CHANDLER THAT MAN LOOKS LIKE HE IS ON STEROIDS AND COULD EASILY BE BETTER THAN DALVIN COOK AND DARE I SAY HE REMINDS ME OF ADRIAN PETERSON BUT LET’S CALM THE HELL DOWN HE HAS A LOT MORE TO PROVE BECAUSE ADRIAN PETERSON WAS A BEAST BUT MY HOPES ARE HIGH HE LOOKS REALLY REALLY GOOD AND CAN FOLLOW PLAY CALLS VERY WELL AND RUN THE BALL ESPECIALLY ON THOSE FAKE PUNTS WHICH I ADORE IT MAKES ME WANT TO KISS KOC ON THE LIPS BECAUSE HOT DAMN WE ARE TAKING SOME RISKS. HE WON’T FUMBLE THAT SHIT EITHER IT STAYS NICE AND TIGHT IN THE ARM UNLIKE MATTISON WHO MAY AS WELL BE JUGGLING THE BALLS FOR SOMEONE TO SLAP OUT OF HIS HANDS DURING HIS -2 YARD CARRY. I’M NOT TRYING TO BE A HATER BRO I DION’T LIKE HATING ON PLAYERS BUT MATTISON SHOULD BE A BACKUP AND NOT A STARTER.

    Sorry for all caps