In that drive (raiders game to be clear), it felt like we were moving the ball pretty effortlessly and capped it off with a great redzone playcall for a td.
It seems pretty odd that when he was in the game, all the best offensive plays were throws to tyreek (outside of him, we couldn’t really do much at all), but the one drive we don’t have him ends up being our best. Was there a reason for that from a playcalling, scheme, etc perspective? Definitely could also be coincidence.
My theory is that the offense is built around tyreek 2k
If you watch hard knocks there is also a scene where Mike says they aren’t talking about you after this game I fuckdd up. Which means Mike and Tua are catering to Tyreek.
It’s not a bad thing. It’s not a good thing. I think they really are catering. They need to let waddle get some plays in the 1 slot cuz without reek waddle look great and Tua was flowing
Baby brain.
It’s not a handicap to build your gameplan around reek going for 100 yards.
It’s just the agenda. The head coach said it himself and if Ima get downvoted for something mike said then yall cray
“If they aren’t talking about you after this game, I fucked up”
That’s reaching. You throw to whos open. No one gives a fuck about some dumb ass record in the middle of a game.
It’s just like Reddit-brained to think a head coach is legitimately prioritizing that lol.
We shall see