In that drive (raiders game to be clear), it felt like we were moving the ball pretty effortlessly and capped it off with a great redzone playcall for a td.

It seems pretty odd that when he was in the game, all the best offensive plays were throws to tyreek (outside of him, we couldn’t really do much at all), but the one drive we don’t have him ends up being our best. Was there a reason for that from a playcalling, scheme, etc perspective? Definitely could also be coincidence.

  • nackmancudiB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    My theory is that the offense is built around tyreek 2k

    If you watch hard knocks there is also a scene where Mike says they aren’t talking about you after this game I fuckdd up. Which means Mike and Tua are catering to Tyreek.

    It’s not a bad thing. It’s not a good thing. I think they really are catering. They need to let waddle get some plays in the 1 slot cuz without reek waddle look great and Tua was flowing

      • nackmancudiB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        It’s not a handicap to build your gameplan around reek going for 100 yards.

        It’s just the agenda. The head coach said it himself and if Ima get downvoted for something mike said then yall cray

        “If they aren’t talking about you after this game, I fucked up”

        • yungredosrsB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          That’s reaching. You throw to whos open. No one gives a fuck about some dumb ass record in the middle of a game.

          It’s just like Reddit-brained to think a head coach is legitimately prioritizing that lol.