• unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    88
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    Bold of them when they put enabled by default AI garbage in firefox without the communities consent.

    This would be a lot more meaningful if mozilla leadership was positioned strictly against this shitty tech.

      • lime!@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        this condemnation coming after they enabled the link preview popup by default because “it’s not ai” and having a big “activate ai now!!!” button take up half of it, and then doubling down when people rightfully pointed out to them that this is a textbook dark pattern, makes it hypocritical.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 months ago

          Is there an issue with the link preview pop-up thing? I’m pretty sure librewolf has it on by default

          • lime!@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            they added an ai summary section. it’s disabled by default but it consists more than half of the popup and if disabled has a big blue button on it that activates ai features, the only big blue button on the popup, and it says “continue”. or, it does now. it used to be bigger and say “See more with AI” or some shit.

            • filcuk@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              I feel like there’s a gap in the understanding of this situation. Firefox is struggling for user as is. Imagine you sit at the wheel, everyone and their grandmother are implementing AI everywhere, the average user expects to have AI at their fingertips believe me. Do you choose to stick with the very few who fully reject AI, or at least provide the option to make sure you don’t fall further behind?
              This is a question of survival for every product out there, like it or not.

              • lime!@feddit.nu
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                7 months ago

                several studies over the past few years have shown that a majority of people do not use ai and actively pick products without ai when given the choice. going after the majority feels like a better business decision.

                • sirleonelle@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  I do hate all the ai stuff and wish there wasn’t any of that bullshit in my visible spectrum but none of these articles you’ve linked support the claim of “people don’t use AI”. Are they concerned about AI? That’s for sure. Do they use it anyway? Apparently so!

                  The only article that maybe supports the claim is located behind a paywall and the headline reads that people don’t want AI in their hardware/appliances, nothing about software.

                  People love the path of least resistance, that’s how we’ve always worked, and tools that summarise, translate or otherwise will help us navigate this ad-ridden content-overloaded webscape will see use, at least until something changes about this money-driven content creation scene that is today’s internet (which probably won’t happen, yes, because of AI LLMs)

          • lime!@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 months ago

            all of that is correct and also basically what i said. the reason it became a big deal was because of accessibility. the definition of a “long press” is short enough that older users, who tend to hold the mouse button down for longer after a click, were suddenly seeing popup windows everywhere and, believing it to be an issue of the site they were on, assumed their popup blocker was broken. the timing was adjusted to one second in an update and also the long press shortcut was made optional.

            when it was pointed out to mozilla that having a popup containing one big blue button in a popup with fancy graphics around it might also be harking back to the popup ads of yore, and that it might compel people to click on the only visible button on instinct, their head of firefox did an interview with pc world where he countered this with, and i’m paraphrasing here, “nuh-uh”. this was in reference to an ama they did where several interaction experts weighed in with frankly pretty standard stuff: don’t surprise the user, don’t shove things in their face, don’t draw attention needlessly.

            for reference, here is the popup post-fixing:

            before they pushed an update the button didn’t say “continue”, it said “Summarize with AI ✨” and didn’t have a “cancel” option.

              • lime!@feddit.nu
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                7 months ago

                oh believe you me i am incredibly concerned about all of it. but they didn’t listen to feedback, is the point. it’s still there, it still pops up randomly due to no accessibility research, it’s still blue.

      • lost_faith@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’d rather they let me know that there is an add-on I “could” add that will add AI tools to my browser, if I wanted

    • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      They twisted my arm trying to get my consent for the new ToS.
      Luckily I was able to get ito about:config and set the flag to disable the ToS-banner.
      Fuck that.

        • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          in the adress bar enter about:config. The flag which seems to control the banner were:

          • termsofuse.bypassNotification -> true (very sure about that)
          • browser.termsofuse.prefMigrationCheck -> true (not sure about that)
  • collapse_already@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 months ago

    I had to use regedit to get rid of it. I still have a win11 boot disk, but I mostly run kubuntu now. Forty years of Microsoft being my primary operating system has come to a close. One drive and Copilot drove me away.

    Funny hearing this criticism from Mozilla though.

  • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 months ago

    It’s worse than that. I have uninstalled that shit every day for the past month off the same computer, and it just pops right back on within 24 hours.

    • FatVegan@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      I had to boot up windows for the first time in a while now and holy shit what an absolute mess that is. Install this, no, remind me again in 3 days. Pop up, pop up, pop up. Opens xbox game center randomly. What in the world is xbox game center, why is it on my computer and opens every other time i hit the windows key? I had to watch a youtube video on how to disable/delete it. I hope that whole company burns down to tge ground

  • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 months ago

    Hmmm…what about the VPN plugin I didnt ask for?
    Why again did you put this in the UI front and center without just asking me “Hey, we’ve got our own VPN. Want to pin it to your tool bar?”
    No we need to figure out how to tell our clients what to do with it or findout how to automatically get rid of it.

    • calisti@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      They need to earn money to pay developers. The Google deal isn’t going to hold forever and has been a pain point for a long time.

      • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Why again did you put this in the UI front and center without just asking me “(…)”

        Man…Reading comprehension really took a nose dive on lemmy.

        • calisti@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          You don’t understand business. Your own reaction is the best display for why they should not and did not implement this as a one-time question just as you proposed. As you proposed, notably, so that you have the easiest possible way to disregard it.

          • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            You don’t understand business.

            May be. Bur I understand user satisfaction.
            And I, for instamce, don’t like being bombarded with “HEY! :D WE’VE GOT THIS NEW TOOL YOU MIGHT WANNA TRY”

    • fallaciousBasis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Oh man. I used to work for Apple.

      My best advice… Don’t give the advisor™ any reason to believe you’re gonna dsat their ass. You’ll get passed off to another department (they won’t help you, either) ASAP.

      And they don’t have good troubleshooting scripts… So tuck in.