🤮

  • Struggle2RealB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    So, OP speaks to the arod deal as though it is done fully in hindsight. Applying the same benefit to the darnold deal, I think there’s no question that deal was worse.

    Iirc, the Sam price was #6 overall and three years worth of 2nds to move to #3. This was an unproven prospect, and the price was signifigantly more via draft capital.

    Vs a 2 time MVP, at the cost of moving back 2 slots in the first and two 2nds.

    If the a rod deal doesn’t work out, it looks to be a reasonable gamble even in retrospect. The Sam deal in hindsight isn’t a disaster, but it’s worse imo.

    • 0ddmanrushB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You have to consider the situation at the time of these deals.