What the fuck? Starmer must have known about this, never mind about harbouring Mandelson again.
The whole system is corrupted.
The system is behaving as intended, and as it always has. The suffragettes were treated just as harshly.
UK media has been barred from disclosing it until now.
How had it not been ‘leaked’ to foreign media and reported on? It is nothing short of disgusting that the government can act with such impunity when they decide to do something that they are fully aware would generate harsh criticism.
Nothing that the government do or decide upon should be banned from the media, with the exception of where it may affect children in a negative way.
The whole reason that they are in their positions are because people who trusted them gave them their vote. It absolutely flies a massive “fuck you” in the face of that.
It was. I’ve known about this for weeks, so any anglophone journalist probably has as well. They don’t want to report on it.
It is really vindicating in a sickening way that the West does not care much about pretending to be free any longer. More and more people take a second look and realize it was only ever so free as long as you were aligned. And it not smart to be aligned with the bourgies if you are a prole.
The judge, in fact the whole process was obviously biased against the defendents. How exactly is this a fair trial? The whole thing stinks to the high heavens.
Who are they supposed to have been terrorising? On whom did they inflict terror?
the judge ruled that there appeared to be a ‘terrorist connection’ as the activists were attempting to influence the Israeli government by restricting its access to weapons.
This is suuuch a stretch.
It’s just not terrorism, by any normal understanding of that word. It doesn’t inflict any terror on anyone, either intentionally or unintentionally, nor does it even attempt to inflict terror.
The shareholders?
Eroding the legitimacy of the courts doesn’t seem like an excellent strategy right now
What legitimacy?
but, didn’t the courts declared that arresting them. qas groundless and illegal, and were all released after a year in jail. then they kept arresting them again?
Rule of Law my ass.
I guess we should also be thinking, how many people have been convicted since 9/11 under these secret courts. Yes, most were probably actual terrorists but it would be certain that many innocent people were convicted if you can’t try them in courts designed to mitigate that (jury + beyond resolvable doubt or whatever the term is)
Yes, most were probably actual terrorists
USA following suit soon in their own way.
It is more like the USA is leading the way, and the UK is taking an example.
deleted by creator
