• efficientshelter69OPB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yup, and the numbers reflect that. Both are at their best with the ball in their hands without two guys in the paint. Their games aren’t optimized when they’re relegated to primarily being an off-ball player.

    Its a shame that your star prospect has gotten better all over the board and then you relegate him to role player as a reward. I hope its to increase Siakam’s trade value otherwise what are we doing in what was supposed to be a developmental season.

    • The_SaltShakerB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The numbers absolutely do not reflect that, not even close. Just look at Scotties numbers with and without Siakam and Poeltl on the court:

      With both Siakam and Jak: 239 minutes, -0.2 net rating, 51.2 FG%, 57.3 2PT%, 40.6 3PT%, 59.7 TS%, 0.97 Points per Possession, 16.3% Free Throw Rate, 37.2% 3 Point Rate, 20.6% Usage Rate

      W/O both Siakam and Jak: 153 minutes, -8.7 net rating, 37.7 FG%, 43.1 2PT%, 29.4 3PT%, 45.1 TS%, 0.82 Points per Possession, 12.9% Free Throw Rate, 40% 3 Point Rate, 28.2% Usage Rate

      Scottie’s efficiency plummets like a stone when Jak and Siakam are out, and he takes even more 3s and draws fewer fouls when they’re on the bench. Like it’s night and day. Why make stuff up?

      Stats from fantasylabs.com/nba/on-off/