• Meth_HardyB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It means he will now face a three-match ban rather than one and the Mail reports his language towards referee Anthony Taylor was ‘personally abusive’

    Personally abusive? I’m guessing he was asking if a hair pull is a red card offence? Or if he’s certain that he should be awarding a penalty, considering the one he gave for Newcastle against Wolves was a complete error. Or if he’s come to terms with the fact he will never be given a European final again following last season’s Europa Conference final.

    To be honest, Taylor is one of the worst refs in the league. He would probably take personal offence to Dunk asking him if he was sure, considering how arrogant and clueless he seems to be half the time. I look forward to him being fucked off to the championship for another week.

    • ThereWillBeGoalsB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      face a three-match ban

      I don’t think that’s right. Van Dijk only got an extra game for “personally abusive” language, so I’d bet Dunk gets the same.

  • EmergencyOriginal982B
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think we need transcripts of what a player says to officials to warrant a red or yellow card. It’ll be the only way players alter how they speak to refs as they will be concerned about their image and brand.

  • Tim-SanchezB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Crazy that it hasn’t happened in so long, especially with what you can lipread and know is being said. If referees were much stricter on dissent at the top level it would have a huge benefit at all levels of the game. It would be tough for a few weeks with probably a lot of red cards, but teams and players would soon adapt.

  • lala_b11B
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Didn’t mitrovic abuse a referee last season?