I’ve been trying to find a good Marxist instance, but Lemmygrad and Hexbear are widely hated. Why is that? Are there any good leftist instances?

  • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    That’s not the part people have an issue with, the part where their users deny genocides, call everyone that has a less extreme left opinion of politics Nazis, end up being so “anti-racism” that they’re racists themselves and take all critics as personal attacks, that’s what people have an issue with.

    • Amerikan Pharaoh@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      end up being so “anti-racism” that they’re racists themselves

      lmao shut up ; settler tears are abundant in supply and abysmally low in both demand and quality

    • Garfield@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      end up being so “anti-racism” that they’re racists themselves

      anyone complaining about “reverse racism” or “anti white racism” is a complete joke. like boo fucking hoo, someone called you a cracker on the internet, get over it.

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Racism has a definition that’s fairly easy to understand and yes people of all colors can be victims and even people of the same skin colour can be racists against one another because racism isn’t necessarily about the color of your skin, it can be about your ethnicity.

        Racism:

        prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism by an individual, community, or institution against a person or people on the basis of their membership in a particular racial or ethnic group, typically one that is a minority or marginalized.

        Ethnicity:

        the quality or fact of belonging to a population group or subgroup made up of people who share a common cultural background or descent.

        If you had taken a crowd of anonymous Germans all dressed the same in 1935, how would you have told who was a Jew and who wasn’t? You wouldn’t have been able to because they were all just white people.

        What do you call it when 100 years ago in a first world white country the population that speaks one official language has an infant mortality rate comparable to that of colonial Africa while the population that speaks the other official language and lives in the same cities has an infant mortality rate comparable to any other first world nation?

        Was the Rwanda genocide not racism because it was two groups with the same skin colour? What about what happened in Yugoslavia?

        My white friend who went to China to study had to sit through multiple explanations by many Chinese student of the levels of intelligence being affected by skin colour and ethnicity and guess what, whites weren’t at the top! “All white people are dumber than Indians who are dumber than Koreans who are dumber than Chinese.” Are you telling me that isn’t racism against white people (and anyone that isn’t Chinese)? Because I sure would hope someone would call me a racist if I was saying the same thing about people of another skin colour or ethnicity!

        • ghost_of_faso2@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          you see i have pulled out the dictionary definition of racism and also an annecdote about how a country colonized by white people for centuries can actually be racist against my white friend for calling him a ‘cracker’, defeating your arguement

        • v12riceburner@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Racism is not easy to understand and you’re definitely not going to get a clear understanding of it from reading a definition especially if you’re white. I suggest you read some books. Good heavens maybe your racist Chinese friend is right.

          Edit I hear this is a good book

          White fragility by Robin diangelo

        • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Racism against white people would be a problem if white people were not the perpetrators of racism against the entire world for centuries, whilst looting and genociding and dehumanising other races. Except the fact that they have and do it in unison and cheerfully, in the name of “white man’s burden” bullshit. And people like you defend it and carry water for them.

          You know which country “inspired” and taught racial segregation policies to Hitler? USA. The country that defected Europeans colonised by genociding Native American indigenous people. I swear this whole shit has to be some kind of grand project, because Albert Pike (most famous Freemason leader) spoke of 3 world wars that West invents, 2 of which have been exactly invented the way he described, and he uses terms like Nazism, a term or ideology which did not even exist in 1891.

          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m581aW5AH4M

          The game is over for Anglos.

          • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            So you’re saying that what the Jews were victim of during WW2 wasn’t racism? Because they certainly were white!

            How about the Irish? The deportation of Acadians? French Canadians seeing their language becoming illegal to teach in Manitoba? The Yugoslav wars?

            By your logic it’s also impossible to be racist towards Chinese and Japanese because man, let me tell you, they can be racist as fuck towards everyone else and they were the ones in power on their side of the world for centuries!

            Racism has a definition and it’s a bad thing no matter who the victim is.

              • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                It’s funny how it’s always the same whenever you’re confronted to arguments. You just insult the other party and leave the scene like you were a hero.

                Also very funny you should call me a cracker when you don’t know what’s my origin, you just assume I’m white because you would be unable to accept that someone not white could realize that racism goes all ways.

      • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        That isn’t what they are talking about, hopefully. But if it is, I agree, a hearty “lol” is in order.

        • Garfield@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          they replied confirming to me that what they were complaining about was in fact racism against white people, given that it seems to be a pretty common bit on lemmygrad to call people crackers and compare them to that kid who went onto fox news to complain about his face being photoshopped onto a picture of a ritz cracker by left wing students at his university that seems to be what they were complaining about

          edit: i found a picture of the guy

    • davel@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      The “Uyghur genocide” is bullshit Atlanticist propaganda, and English-language Wikipedia is basically NATOpedia in its slant on the topic, so yes we will deny it. It’s a product of the new Cold War propaganda campaign against China.

      • Amerikan Pharaoh@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Atlanticist crackers are exactly why I’m a third-worldist; I genuinely care more about my community’s diaspora than I’d ever care about these genocidal neocolonist crackers

      • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I get why people would believe it like a decade ago when the facts were still kind of up in the air, but now even west media is like “yeaaah we looked into it and all of it is complete and utter bullshit” and yet you still have people confidently going on like it’s still a thing.

        Eventually you have to come to the grips with the fact that the only reason you believe in the Uyghur genocide is because you’re racist.

      • redballooon@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Here are some properties of any conspiracy theory worth it’s name:

        • Closed Ideological Systems: They provide an all-encompassing explanation for various events or states, with everything fitting into their worldview.
        • Immunity to Facts: Any contrary evidence is dismissed as false or considered part of the conspiracy.
        • Enemy Construction: They tend to draw a clear line between “us” (those who “know the truth”) and “them” (the supposed conspirators).
        • Adaptability: Conspiracy narratives can change and incorporate new “evidence” or events to maintain their credibility.

        It matches for QAnon and the MAGA crowd as well as the lemmygrad crowd.

        • ghost_of_faso2@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          not having the self awareness to realize this applies to anti-communists, not communists/MLs as they use scientific reasoning.

          • redballooon@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            Just to understand what you are saying, do you say communists apply scientific reasoning?

              • redballooon@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                10 months ago

                That’s very abstract and doesn’t mean much. With as many words you can say capitalism is based on scientific reasoning.

                • ghost_of_faso2@lemmygrad.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Its not abstract at all, ‘Marxism’ is an entire field in sociology and is recongised + fundemental to understanding sociology.

            • Camarada Forte@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Yes, Marxism is based on a scientific methodology called historical materialism. It’s too complex to be explained in a single comment, but it has an internal logic and methodology which proposes to analyze social systems in general, but especially capitalist societies in particular.

              You can’t use the scientific method used in the natural sciences because you can’t put a society in a lab to study it. Social sciences require a methodology apart from the natural sciences, and Marxism has proposed historical materialism, which is very consistent and coherent approach, based on the Hegelian dialectical logic with materialism as a principle.

        • Camarada Forte@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          How ironic! Let’s see if it fits for the “genocide” position:

          • Closed Ideological Systems: Whether those who defend the idea of “genocide” in Xinjiang are aware or not, the sources used to claim there is a genocide in Xinjiang is usually Adrian Zenz, a German white supremacist and Christian fundamentalist who claimed in his book Worthy to Escape that “other belief systems are ultimately inspired by Satan” and justifies “eternal punishment” for those who refuse to believe in Jesus.

          • Immunity to Facts: Every time one tries to argue that Xinjiang faced a policy of de-radicalization of terrorists who led many attacks against the province, those who claim there is a genocide there say they are “genocide deniers.” I’ve even seen people saying those who don’t agree with the “genocide” position are paid by the Chinese.

          • Enemy Construction: I can’t even count the number of times people have called those who don’t promote the “genocide” propaganda “tankies” and dismissing them instead of engaging with arguments.

          • Adaptability: The “genocide” propaganda claims there is a genocide there, and then when presented with the fact that even those who were put in the re-education facilities were allowed to express their culture with dances and art on video, the “genocide” conspiracy theorists say that it was a fake, an act, that it was a spectacle organized by the Chinese to hide the genocide. Just to give you an example.

          It does match the “genocide” position very well. I’ve yet to see a genocide which preserves the language, the culture, the customs and the places of worship of a people. Another thing, notice the reaction of Muslim countries to the actual genocide being perpetrated by Israel. They are firmly condemning it through all channels. In contrast, the policies of de-radicalization by the Chinese were unanimously well-received by Muslim countries.

    • Camarada Forte@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      their users deny genocides

      If you are referring to the Xinjiang issue, then it just reaffirms what @davel@lemmy.ml just said:

      it’s largely because the Anglosphere has been indoctrinated against real, actual socialism their entire lives

      Because the “Uyghur genocide” in Xinjiang is another example of propaganda. Or do you really think the West cares about Muslims and want to protect their “freedom”?

      call everyone that has a less extreme left opinion of politics Nazis

      I don’t see anyone in Lemmygrad calling other people “Nazis” because they disagree with someone in a discussion. I usually see them criticizing others as “liberals.” This is either a misrepresentation of leftists in general, very common among conservatives, or you are frequently being called a Nazi. I don’t know, maybe that’s on you? 🤔

      end up being so “anti-racism” that they’re racists themselves and take all critics as personal attacks

      That’s so specific you should give at least one example of this. We have very strict moderation against any bigotry, so I challenge you to link any “racist” attitude or comment you have seen in Lemmygrad. I will give you 24 hours, and if you don’t reply with an example, I will edit this comment saying you chickened out.

      EDIT: They chickened out, as expected.

      • redballooon@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Another repeating problem is the vast generalizations. Treating “the West” as if they’re all Bush Jr. or Reagan.

        • Camarada Forte@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          The West ≠ Western citizens

          North Atlantic imperialist countries is what we refer as “the West”. They have shared interests and in terms of foreign policy act almost in unison, so much so that a single term to describe North American and Western European countries is not a generalization, it’s quite appropriate actually.

        • TarkovSurvivor@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          If “the west” isn’t voting for Bush or Reagan then they’re hailing people like Obama, who destroyed Libya and brought back open air slave markets - or Clinton who destroyed Belgrade and undermined social protections for workers. To think you are somehow better because you support(ed?) Genocide Joe is just delusion.

    • deur@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Holy shit you got them to brigade your comment. They might as well be bots, I think Chat GPT’s “intelligence” outpaces them.

      • Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        They have a community dedicated to organizing brigades so it’s no surprise that they are brigading their comment

        !the_dunk_tank@hexbear.net

        The rules in the side bar are very telling

        Of course the last time I mentioned it’s existence with one of my alts I got a 2 week sitewide-ban so this comment probably won’t last long

        Edit: Spleling

    • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      That’s a liberal with no framework. No one denies genocides (pro-tip just because the western media says it’s a genocide doesn’t make it a genocide.) Being so anti-racist you are the real racist is the Liberal Democratic party who elected a hard-core segregationist as president, not a Marxist Leninist. No one except people like you give a fuck about personal attacks. lol.