Wondering what the consensus is on starting players on bye to avoid dropping players. Particularly for teams who have already clinched the playoffs.

  • CoopThereItIsB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Would love to know the example scenario in this case.

    My opinion has generally been that this is fine. But my grander scheme opinion is that, if a team can’t feel comfortable fielding a starting lineup without compromising the future of their team, that league either needs more bench spots or IR spots next year.

  • 0percentdnfB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I would suggest that the worse etiquette might actually be to gift a team with enough FAAB or waiver priority a valuable player.

    If your league doesn’t have a rule dictating that you need to start a fully active lineup, then there’s nothing to worry about.

  • runningblackB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    As long as there’s no rule against it, it’s fine.

    I also generally think that rules against that, specifically, are bad. If you have good players that you don’t want to drop during a bye, it’s your perogative to take it on the chin that week.

    But reasons matter - doing that because you don’t want to drop players = fine. Doing that to make it so that a weaker opponent gets a free win is not.

  • MrObjectiveB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    If your league mates think it’s an issue, have them make a rule for next season. In the meantime, do what you need to do to win the 'chip!

  • UntchjB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I clinched 2 weeks ago. Everyone else is in a dogfight for the remaining 3 spots.

    I do everything I can to field a full lineup. I go as far as dropping my kicker/defense and adding a late defense only if it’s needed. Ie the other week i picked up the jets off waivers specifically bc they had a Monday night game. I would have dropped them if the afternoon games put our matchup out of contention. It was still tight so I kept the jets and I won by 2 points.

    In another week, I dropped my kicker only after the result was out of contention:

    This week, I dropped my kicker bc after the first 4 games I had a huge projected lead.

    This upcoming week, I have both my QBs on a bye. I’m gonna add a 3rd starting QB and drop my kicker. And even then, I’ll do what I can to potentially add a kicker at the 4pm games if it’s close

    Bottom line, I’ve been in that position where every game matters and there’s just no way I could be ‘that’ guy and give someone else a free win. Unless I absolutely must and even then the most I’ll do is drop a kicker. Stuff like this is how fantasy can get personal lol It speaks to someone’s character for someone to just say F the whole league