https://x.com/sports_mediocre/status/1729163585656668432?s=46&t=edObBdCuQN4bjD7HQAyuYg
I found a thread on twitter and the guy breaks down Luka’s impact with supporting data. Is Luka a generational talent or an overrated player? Everyone seems to think he’s a winning player but the stats say otherwise.
Some stats below:
Kyrie with Luka together: +/- +2.95 (286 mins)
Luka (Kyrie on bench): +/- -3.5 (275 mins)
Kyrie (Luka on bench): +/- +5.6 (142 mins)
u/irelli thoughts on these sort of stats? Just have a hard time thinking he’s an actual net negative
I think they made that post after the one I made, but there was actually some good insight from it.
Luka is elite but he doesn’t fit the current team that well/ the team doesn’t fit his needs that well, doesn’t mean he isn’t a top 5/10 player, just means he needs specific pieces around him, like with Harden.
The Kyrie Luka pairing is fun to watch(and amazing on 2k) but let’s be honest they are never winning shit lol
> the stats say otherwise!
> shows one particular stat
“I want to feel right about every single pointless basketball opinion I have so here is skewed data that confirms why I am right and 99.9% of people that watch basketball are wrong”
How is it skewed?
Again, I’m not saying I agree. But I would like to be informed
Yes, fire that bum.
OPs +/- is 0, hes better than Luka!
Luka a ho. And he is a fat loser. Of course he’s overrated.
Luka is going to be painted with same brush as Harden in 5 years.