Thanks for all the interesting replies! Given the response, I decided to make a whole community around this, hope you’ll consider joining!

If you liked this thread, you might like: !likethismaylike@lemm.ee

Remember, if you’re on a different instance you may have to search the url first: https://lemm.ee/c/likethismaylike

  • morganth@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    If I love “unreliable shifting cities” narratives, like Dark City, Fallen London and the City of Saints and Madmen books, what similar kinds of settings might I like?

    • ALostInquirer@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not familiar with those, so this might be a bad suggestion, but the short description makes me think this may still fit, have you read The City & the City by China Miéville?

      It’s set in two overlapping cities, whose inhabitants diligently disregard the other city’s until they formally cross the borders, and it’s a crime to do otherwise. It’s a pretty compelling read imo!

          • Khrux@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I stumbled across this the other week while trying to find the name of the book invisible cities and gave it a watch because the trailer reminded me of Disco Elysium.

            Without knowing the original novel, I thought it was really compelling and entertaining, with my only major critique being the pacing of the final episode, but equally 4 episodes is such an easy commitment that I’d absolutely recommend the show if you aren’t in the mood to pick up a book.

    • Drusas@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      If an unreliable shifting house would work, House of Leaves by Mark Danielewski. The writing is very much love it or hate it for a lot of people, but the idea fits.

      Edit: Oh! And House of Windows by John Langan. No relation despite the similar titles.

        • athos77@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          I saw the tv series first (the book came later) and really enjoyed it. I think some of the special effects are dated and … I’m not sure but, like, when I read the book, the tv characters had already been established in my brain as canonical, so I saw and heard those characters as I read the book. In cases where I’ve read the book first, sometimes I have my own version of canonical characters in my brain and it can be hard for me to accept those characters if I really loved the book and the on-screen depiction is very different. And the opportunity for a disconnect (and disappointment) between versions just increases when you’re dealing with a world that varies (yet is so dependent) on our own.

          tl;dr: you might find it disappointing because it doesn’t ‘match’ the world you read, or because of some of the effects. But I absolutely loved the series, both at the time and still now - I watched it again just over the summer.

          • DogWater@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Such a good point about accepting the character in TV and movie adaptation. It can really increase the risk of not liking the adaptation