The player above is Miles Bridges and he becomes an unrestricted free agent at the end of the season meaning he could be dealt at the dealine. Charlotte’s season looks to be done again with Lamelo missing extended time and they may want to tank again for the next two years to be in the Cooper Kupp/Boozer sweepstakes.
Of course the off court stuff is a major yikes. Not condoing it at all but it is a business and he could be had for cheap
What’s your stance on reckless generalizations?
Also, we don’t know famous people beyond what we see on the surface, we know two things about him, he good at basketball, and has had multiple off court issues, including incidents AFTER DV. It’s not unreasonable to not what someone like that, someone we don’t know.
I’m all for 2nd, 3rd, 100th chances because I truly believe part of asking people to stop/improve requires society to “accept” them back, otherwise why would someone stop doing the wrong things. But not only has he very recently had issues, again we don’t have any relationship with him, so its a pass. Now my aunt who has messed up multiple times and FINALLY turned it around, well that’s different because I know her, I know her faults weren’t the totality of her, I know she wanted to change, I see she has. But some random person who just did shitty stuff doesn’t get the same leeway less than two months removed from his recent issue. So in a binary, want or don’t want, I’ll chose don’t without hesitation.
And really, it’s a weird look to point out not make some incidents define someone, yet call EVERYONE guilty of something out of nowhere.